342 26. BOUNDS FOR THE HEAT KERNEL FOR EVOLVING METRICS
Lx,T· By definition, His the minimal positive solution to (26.6)-(26.7), i.e.,
(26.35a) ( ~~ - /::;.x, 7 H + Q (x, r) H) (x, r; y, v) = 0,
(26.35b) lim H ( ·, r; y, v) = 6y.
T',,V
We have the following symmetry property between H and the adjoint
heat kernel H* for L; r
'
LEMMA 26.13. For any x, y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST we have
H(x,r;y,v) = H* (y,v;x,r).
In particular,
(26.36a)
(26.36b)
( ~~ + /::;.y,vH) (x, r; y, v) + (R-Q) (y, v) H (x, r; y, v) = 0,
lim H (x, r; ·, v) = 6x.
V/'T
PROOF. This is true because of the construction of the heat kernel on
a noncompact manifold as the limit of a sequence of Dirichlet heat kernels
(see §5 of Chapter 24) and the fact that Lemma 26.3 holds for Dirichlet heat
kernels. D
We have the following LI estimate for the heat kernel in the noncompact
case.
LEMMA 26.14 (LI-norm of heat kernel is bounded-noncompact case).
Let (Mn,g (T)), r E [O, T], be an evolving complete noncompact Riemannian
manifold such that supM !sect (g (0))1, supMx[O,T] IRijl, supMx[O,TJ l'ViRjkl
are finite. Then for the minimal positive fundamental solution H to (26.4)
we have
(26.37)
for any y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST, where
CI ~ sup IR - QI < oo.
Mx[O,T]
Since CI = 0 when Q = R, we immediately obtain the following.
COROLLARY 26.15 (LI-norm of heat kernel is preserved when Q = R -
noncompact case). Under the hypotheses of Lemma 26.14, now with Q = R,
we have
(26.38)
for any y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST.