342 26. BOUNDS FOR THE HEAT KERNEL FOR EVOLVING METRICSLx,T· By definition, His the minimal positive solution to (26.6)-(26.7), i.e.,
(26.35a) ( ~~ - /::;.x, 7 H + Q (x, r) H) (x, r; y, v) = 0,
(26.35b) lim H ( ·, r; y, v) = 6y.
T',,V
We have the following symmetry property between H and the adjoint
heat kernel H* for L; r
'
LEMMA 26.13. For any x, y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST we haveH(x,r;y,v) = H* (y,v;x,r).
In particular,(26.36a)(26.36b)( ~~ + /::;.y,vH) (x, r; y, v) + (R-Q) (y, v) H (x, r; y, v) = 0,
lim H (x, r; ·, v) = 6x.
V/'T
PROOF. This is true because of the construction of the heat kernel on
a noncompact manifold as the limit of a sequence of Dirichlet heat kernels
(see §5 of Chapter 24) and the fact that Lemma 26.3 holds for Dirichlet heat
kernels. DWe have the following LI estimate for the heat kernel in the noncompact
case.LEMMA 26.14 (LI-norm of heat kernel is bounded-noncompact case).
Let (Mn,g (T)), r E [O, T], be an evolving complete noncompact Riemannian
manifold such that supM !sect (g (0))1, supMx[O,T] IRijl, supMx[O,TJ l'ViRjkl
are finite. Then for the minimal positive fundamental solution H to (26.4)
we have(26.37)for any y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST, where
CI ~ sup IR - QI < oo.
Mx[O,T]Since CI = 0 when Q = R, we immediately obtain the following.COROLLARY 26.15 (LI-norm of heat kernel is preserved when Q = R -
noncompact case). Under the hypotheses of Lemma 26.14, now with Q = R,
we have(26.38)for any y EM and 0 :S v < r :ST.