The Globe and Mail - 11.09.2019

(Dana P.) #1
John McBain, President and CEO of Canada
Lands Company, a national real estate developer
and attractions manager, is pleased to confirm
theGovernment of Canada’s appointments of
Jocelyne Houle and Margaret MacDonald to
the company’s Board of Directors, effective
June 19, 2019.

Ms. Houle has had a long career in the public
sector. She was the mayor of the City of Buck-
ingham, Québec, from 1999 to 2001, and be-
came municipal councillor for the Buckingham
District of the City of Gatineau. She also served
as deputy mayor and vice-president of the ex-
ecutive committee of the City. In addition to her
activities in the public sector, Ms. Houle was
proprietor of Houle Jewellers in Buckingham
for 36 years. She is very active in her comm-
unity and is involved with several associations
and community organizations.

Ms. MacDonald is a former deputy minister with
the Province of Nova Scotia, serving in several
portfolios. She has also acted as financial coun-
sel to the Province, as well as legal advisor in
land and resource management transactions
with extensive experience in Crown land legal
matters. Ms. MacDonald has been an active par-
ticipant in many initiatives, including the devel-
opment of public sector accounting standards
and audit engagement.

Canada Lands Company is a self-financing, federal
Crown corporation. Leveraging its subsidiaries,
the Company transforms former Government of
Canada properties and reintegrates them into
local communities while ensuring their long-term
sustainability and commercial viability. Canada Lands
Company also holds, invests in and manages world-
renowned attractions such as the CN Tower and
Downsview Park in Toronto, the Old Port of Montréal
and the Montréal Science Centre.

Jocelyne Houle,Chair

Margaret MacDonald,Director

http://www.clc.ca|[email protected]

B2| REPORTONBUSINESS O THEGLOBEANDMAIL | WEDNESDAY,SEPTEMBER11,


Aimia Inc.’slargest investor has
filed a counterclaim against the
loyalty company and six current
and former members of the
board.Mittleman Bros.also filed
a statement of defence in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
that rebuts Aimia’s July lawsuit
accusing the dissident investor of

violating a contracted truce.
The litigious showdown is the
latest development in a drawn-
out battle over control of the
board of directors.
In a statement, Chris Mittle-
man called it “extremely dis-
appointing” that the Aimia
board opted to take matters to

the courts, saying shareholders
“deserve nothing less” than
seasoned business professionals.
Aimia sold the Aeroplan
rewards business to Air Canada
earlier this year for $450-million,
leaving it with significant cash on
hand but also questions about its
future.THECANADIANPRESS

MITTLEMANFILESCOUNTERCLAIMAGAINSTAIMIA

ABUDHABIAustralian oil and gas
producer Woodside Energy is
seeking to reduce its stakes in
the Scarborough gas field at
home and in Canada’s Kitimat
liquefied natural gas (LNG)
project to cut its capital expo-
sure, its CEO said on Tuesday.

The comments by CEO Peter
Coleman came after speculation
Saudi Aramco could be in-
terested in Scarborough. Wood-
side holds a 75-per-cent stake in
the gas field and 50 per cent of
the Kitimat project in Canada.
“We just look at that and say

from a capital management and
risk-management point of view
we would rather hold less equi-
ty,” Mr. Coleman said. “It also
helps us fund through this next
expenditure cycle if we can
reduce our capital requirement.”
REUTERS

WOODSIDESEEKSABUYERFORITSSTAKEINKITIMATLNGPROJECT

Lawyers for the Trump adminis-
tration want a U.S. judge to
throw out a lawsuit from Native
American tribes trying to block
the proposed Keystone XL oil
pipeline from Canada to Ne-
braska.
Tribes in Montana and South
Dakota say U.S. President Do-
nald Trump approved the pipe-
line without considering poten-
tial damage to cultural sites
from spills and construction.
The administration counters
that Mr. Trump’s approval
applies only to a 1.6-kilometre
section of pipeline along the

U.S.-Canada border and not the
rest of the line.
U.S. District Judge Brian
Morris will preside over a
Thursday hearing on the gov-
ernment’s attempt to dismiss
the case. The judge blocked the
line in November, saying more
environmental studies were
needed. But Mr. Trump circum-
vented that ruling in March by
issuing a new permit for the
US$8-billion, 1,900-kilometre
project.
The Assiniboine and Gros
Ventre tribes of the Fort Belk-
nap Indian Reservation in Mon-

tana and South Dakota’s Rose-
bud Sioux tribe say Mr. Trump’s
action violated their rights
under treaties from the
mid-1800s.
“They’re saying we can’t sue
the President, and the tribes’
treaties essentially mean noth-
ing. We completely disagree,”
said Matthew Campbell, a Na-
tive American Rights Fund
lawyer representing the tribes.
“The treaties were agreed to by
the President of the United
States and ratified by the Sen-
ate, so the treaties clearly ap-
ply.”ASSOCIATED PRESS

U.S.SEEKSDISMISSALOFNATIVEAMERICANS’LAWSUITOVERKEYSTONEXLPIPELINE

Two of Canada’s top energy executives are
backing the federalgovernment’s plan to
use a section in the Paris climate accord
that would allow Canada to gain emission
credits for exporting liquefied natural gas
to Asia.
Shell Canada Ltd. president Michael
Crothers and Petronas Energy Canada Ltd.
president Mark Fitzgerald are trying to
fend off criticisms from environmental-
ists, who say exporting LNG isn’t the an-
swer to transitioning to a low-carbon
economy. The parent companies are the
two leading co-owners in LNG Canada,
which began building an $18-billion ex-
port terminal last year in Kitimat, B.C.
Shell and Petronas stand to benefit
from Ottawa’s plan to gain emission cred-
its as energy companies strive to align
their corporate goals with the Paris ac-
cord.
The two Canadian executives say LNG
is a cleaner energy source for power
plants than coal, which is widely used in
Asia to generate electricity. They say that
once LNG Canada starts to export natural
gas in liquid form by early 2025, it would
help decrease air pollution from coal-
fired power plants in countries such as
China.
“Shell sees the potential for bilateral ar-
rangements under the Paris accord to al-
low credit to be given for the low-carbon
intensity exports of gas from Canada to
places in Asia,” Mr. Crothers said.
Under the 2015 Paris agreement to
which Ottawa is a signatory, a section
called Article 6 could clear the way for
bilateral side deals that would mean Can-
ada gains credits toward meeting its tar-
gets for decreasing carbon emissions.
Marc Lee, senior economist with the
B.C. office of the Canadian Centre for Pol-
icy Alternatives, said that in many in-
stances, LNG could displace renewable
energy in China.
LNG Canada’s co-owners “want to
make their project look in as favourable
light as possible because they know peo-
ple are concerned about climate-change
impacts, so they’re framing it as some-
thing that’s going to reduce global emis-
sions,” Mr. Lee said.
But Mr. Crothers and Mr. Fitzgerald,
who are both based in Calgary, said dur-
ing interviews while visiting Vancouver
that long-term demand for LNG in Asia is
strong and it’s best to take a global per-
spective on greenhouse gas (GHG) emis-
sions.
“Emissions reduction has to be consid-
ered in the global context. I wish methane
emissions and carbon dioxide stopped at
the borders, but they don’t,” Mr. Fitzger-
ald said. “Energy demand is not going to
go away. Article 6 is one mechanism that
allows us to treat this truly as a global
opportunity.”
Shell Canada’s parent,Royal Dutch
Shell PLC, is the largest partner in LNG
Canada, with a 40-per-cent stake. The oth-
er partners are Petronas Energy Canada’s


parent, Malaysia’s state-owned Petronas
(25 per cent), PetroChina (15 per cent),
Japan’s Mitsubishi Corp. (15 per cent) and
South Korea’s Kogas (5 per cent).
“China itself has made commitments
to reduce its emissions. You can see that
one of our partners in our LNG project is
a Chinese company,” Mr. Crothers said.
Environment and Climate Change
Minister Catherine McKenna and Natural
Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi have
expressed their support for emissions
trading. Mr. Sohi told The Globe and Mail
in May that Ottawa views Article 6 as an
opportunity for Canada to
reach bilateral pacts with
countries buying LNG such
as China and Japan.
Isabelle Turcotte, director
of federal policy at clean-en-
ergy think tank Pembina In-
stitute, said she is taking a
wait-and-see attitude until
learning details from the
next Conference of the Par-
ties (COP) to be held in De-
cember in Chile, where Arti-
cle 6 will be a major point of
discussion.
“We’re looking forward to
the next COP with much an-
ticipation,” Ms. Turcotte
said. “We’ll be paying atten-
tion to how these negotiations evolve
and culminate to give us a set of rules
that really make sure that we’re not trad-
ing hot air.”
Details for Article 6 are slated to be
worked out in Chile, including the frame-
work of internationally transferred miti-
gation outcomes (ITMOs), which involve
voluntary co-operation arrangements
between two countries.
Jason Dion, lead researcher at Cana-
da’s Ecofiscal Commission, an economics
think tank, is skeptical about whether
Ottawa will be able to easily tap into Arti-
cle 6 and avoid double-counting of emis-
sion reductions. “Someone is going to
have to pay to turn these low-carbon ex-

ports into ITMOs,” Mr. Dion said. “If the
federal government intended to subsidize
the consumption of LNG abroad, then
that would make Canadian LNG more
competitive internationally and China
maybe would be willing to give up ITMOs
if the fuel came in at a subsidized rate.”
He said that it’s in the interest of LNG
companies to cast their product as part of
the solution to global climate change.
Since British Columbia has its own car-
bon tax and provincial policy dealing with
GHG emissions, LNG Canada isn’t subject
to the federalgovernment’s carbon-pric-
ing regime introduced this
year against large emitters
in five provinces: Ontario,
Manitoba, New Brunswick,
Prince Edward Island and
Saskatchewan (partial appli-
cation), as well as two terri-
tories – Yukon and Nunavut.
The Shell-led project is
aiming for 0.15 carbon-diox-
ide equivalent tonnes for
each tonne of LNG pro-
duced, which is a level be-
low British Columbia’s limit
for “emissions intensity” of
0.16 CO2 equivalent tonnes.
LNG Canada estimates
project-related costs will to-
tal $40-billion for the first
phase, counting the $18-billion Kitimat
terminal and various infrastructure that
includes TransCanada Corp.’s $6.2-billion
Coastal GasLink pipeline, which will run
670 kilometres from northeast British Co-
lumbia to Kitimat. The total budget also
includes billions of dollars a year to be
spent by producers drilling for natural gas
in northeast B.C.
While Coastal GasLink has been ap-
proved by all 20 elected First Nation coun-
cils along the planned route, the pipeline
project has been the target of protests led
by a group of eight Wet’suwet’en Nation
hereditary chiefs. The chiefs have cited
climate change among the reasons for
their opposition to Coastal GasLink.

Shell,Petronas backOttawa’spushfor


Parisclimateaccordemissioncredits


Whiletwoenergycompanies


standtogainfromexporting


LNGtoAsia,criticssayitisn’t


theanswertotransitioning


toalow-carboneconomy


PetronasEnergyCanadapresidentMarkFitzgerald,left,andShellCanadapresidentMichael
Crothers,seeninVancouveronSept.4,sayexportingLNGwouldeventuallyreduceair
pollutionfromcoal-firedpowerplantsincountriessuchasChina.
DARRYLDYCK/THEGLOBEANDMAIL

BRENTJANGVANCOUVER


Emissionsreduction
hastobeconsidered
intheglobalcontext.
Iwishmethane
emissionsand
carbondioxide
stoppedatthe
borders,but
theydon’t.

MARKFITZGERALD
PETRONASENERGY
CANADALTD.PRESIDENT

The legal wrangling overSNC-
Lavalin Group Inc.’sattempts to
sell a stake in Ontario’s Highway
407 will continue, as Ferrovial SA
has decided to appeal a recent
court decision that kept it from
increasing its stake in the lucra-
tive toll road.
Infrastructure company Ferro-
vial’s Cintra Global subsidiary
went to the Ontario Superior
Court to keep the engineering gi-
ant from selling a portion of its
407 stake to the Canada Pension
Plan Investment Board for $3.25-
billion. Cintra said a past deal
where it waived its right to buy
the 407 shares should not apply.
The Ferrovial subsidiary argued
that CPPIB, as a major owner and
operator of infrastructure pro-
jects, was a competitor. It failed
to persuade the court.
Cintra has notified the Court
of Appeal for Ontario, SNC and
CPPIB about its intention to ap-
peal, according to a person famil-
iar with the matter who request-
ed anonymity because they were
not authorized to speak publicly
about it.
SNC spokesman Nicolas Ryan
said the appeal “has no impact”
on his company, as SNC, Cintra
and CPPIB had all agreed that
even if the court’s decision were
to be reversed on appeal, the sale
would proceed and CPPIB and
Cintra would adjust the number
of shares of Highway 407 they
own. The company said Aug. 15
the sale had closed.
The sale provides some mea-
sure of relief for beleaguered SNC
shareholders, who have seen the
company’s shares fall by two-
thirds this year. SNC has said it
intends to use the sale proceeds
to pay down debt. Previously,
CPPIB held just over 40 per cent,
with Cintra owning 43.2 per cent
and SNC 16.8 per cent. SNC sold
10 per cent of the 407, giving it
6.8 per cent and CPPIB 50.01 per
cent. CPPIB declined to com-
ment.
SNC initially announced on
April 5 that it struck a deal to sell
that 10-per-cent stake in High-
way 407 to the Ontario Municipal
Employees Retirement System
(OMERS) for $3-billion in cash
and as much as $250-million in
future payments over 10 years.
Both CPPIB and Cintra exercised
their rights to block the transac-
tion, however.
SNC said Tuesday that it has
“fully paid” OMERS the “break
fee” it owed of just over $80-mil-
lion.

SNC-LAVALIN (SNC)
CLOSE: $17.92, UP $1.

Ferrovialto


appealcourt


decision


awarding


SNC’sstakein


407toCPPIB


DAVIDMILSTEAD
NICOLASVANPRAET
Free download pdf