CHAPTER 14 Performance measurement 585
14.5 Individual performance measurement
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 14.5 Discuss the issues surrounding individual performance measurement.
There is a well-known saying: ‘Companies don’t succeed; people do.’ Companies are artificial entities
and do not perform any physical function (the company itself brings owners, workers and resources
together under a legal structure). The people working within companies perform multiple tasks, individ-
ually and in teams, to help accomplish the organisation’s goals. Performance measurement at the indi-
vidual level should highlight to the employees what tasks are important. For example, a sales assistant
may be required to assist customers and make sales. Including both tasks in a performance measurement
system helps managers communicate this to the employee. The performance system may include a cus-
tomer satisfaction measure and a dollar sales measure. If only the sales dollars were measured, then the
sales assistant might focus on making as many sales as possible with little regard to customer service
and needs — and the customer might never return. Such short-term gains would not be good for the
entity in the longer term.
Another consideration of the performance measurement system is the reward system; specifically, the
choice between individual and team-based rewards. Some entities encourage teamwork by including
rewards based on team, department or company-wide performance. Such an approach has the advantage
of encouraging employees to work together and hopefully achieve synergies that individuals could not
achieve working alone. Criticisms of such an approach include the difficulty of managing individuals
who shirk their responsibilities, knowing the team overall will pick up the slack; and managing indi-
viduals within teams who have no incentive to excel individually.
Of special interest under individual performance measurement is executive performance compen-
sation. Some large compensation packages have been reported in recent years. Changes to company
regulations and accounting standards require companies to report on director and executive compen-
sation. Generally, an executive salary package consists of a mix of base salary, incentives based on
achieving certain measurement targets (such as ROI, RI or EVA), stock/share options, and other benefits
such as superannuation, company car and travel. The package could include financial and non-financial
measures, and also encourage both short-term and long-term incentives that help achieve the entity’s
goals. Short-term incentives typically include bonuses for meeting a target.
For example, figure 14.7 illustrates the percentage of fixed and performance-based components
of executive compensation at JB Hi-Fi Ltd. The entity remunerates senior executives by evaluating
‘comparative positions in similar companies and industries and comprises (a) fixed remuneration and
(b) variable remuneration consisting of (i) short-term incentives (annual bonus based on specified perfor-
mance targets as agreed with the executive) and (ii) long-term incentives (options under the JB Hi-Fi
Ltd Executive Share Option Plan)’. The specified performance targets under the short-term incentives
include comparison to budgets, business plans and other qualitative objectives such as corporate gover-
nance, investor relations, succession planning and human capital development.
2015
Salary
and fees Bonus Other^1 Superannuation
Share-based
payments^2 Total
Non-executive directors
G. Richards
J. King
B. Laughton
G. Levin
R. Uechtritz
$
269 033
142 466
144 292
127 660
118 721
$ — — — — —
$ — — — — —
$
20 967
13 534
13 708
28 340
11 279
$ — — — — —
$
290 000
156 000
158 000
156 000
130 000
802 172 — — 87 828 890 000
FIGURE 14.7 JB Hi-Fi Ltd — executive compensation (continued)