151
A thick green scum of algae covers
parts of Lonar Lake, in Maharashtra,
India. Algae thrive in high-nutrient
conditions, but decomposing algae
consume oxygen, and depleted levels of
oxygen lead to fewer fish surviving.
See also: The food chain 132–133 ■ The ecosystem 134–137 ■ Energy flow
through ecosystems 138–139 ■ T roph ic ca scades 14 0 –14 3
ECOSYSTEMS
suggested that the intense fishing
had progressively reduced the
resilience of the ecosystem.
Holling argued that ecological
resilience is not always positive.
If a freshwater lake experiences
a large input of nutrients from
agricultural fertilizers, for example,
it will become eutrophic: algae will
thrive, depleting the lake’s oxygen
and making it unsuitable for fish.
Such a lake may be resilient, but it
will become less biodiverse. Holling
claimed that three critical factors
determine resilience: the most a
system can be changed before
crossing a threshold that makes
total recovery impossible; the ease
or difficulty in making a big change
to the system; and how close to the
threshold a system is currently.
Changing states
According to Holling’s view,
resilience at the ecosystem level is
enhanced by its populations not
being too rigid—meaning that the
components of the ecosystem
can change. One example is the
disappearance of most American
chestnuts from forests in eastern
North America, which was largely
compensated for by the expansion
of oaks and hickories. For Holling,
this counted as resilience, because
although the exact mix of tree
species had changed, broad-leaved
forest still remained.
Ecologists now understand that
ecosystems can have more than
one stable state. In Australia, for
example, woodlands dominated by
mulga trees can exist in a grass-
rich environment that supports
sheep-farming, or in a shrub-
dominated environment that is
totally unsuitable for sheep. ■
The role of budworm
Spruce budworm caterpillars
have devastated balsam fir
forests in eastern North
America six times since
the 18th century. Holling
described this process as
having two very different
states: one with young,
fast-growing trees and few
budworms; and one with
mature trees and very large
numbers of budworms.
Between outbreaks of
budworms, young balsam fir
grow alongside spruce and
white birch trees. Eventually,
the fir becomes dominant.
A combination of this
dominance and a sequence
of very dry years stimulates
a huge increase in the
budworm population. The
mature fir is destroyed, giving
the spruce and birch an
opportunity to regenerate.
By keeping the balsam fir
in check, the budworm also
maintains the spruce and
birch. Without it, the fir trees
would crowd out the others.
So the system is unstable but
at the same time resilient.
Spruce budworm larvae in
Quebec, Canada, feed voraciously
on fir and spruce before they
pupate. Moths emerge about a
month later, ready to mate.
US_150-151_Ecological_resilience.indd 151 12/11/18 7:47 PM