they
havehaddire
consequences,especially
in
dealings
withtheCastruc
ciosoftheworld.Stefanoknewthatthe
prince
hadrisento
powerthrough
treachery
andruthlessness.Thiswasa
man,
after
all,
whohad
put
aclose
anddevotedfriendtodeath.WhenCastrucciowastoldthatithadbeena
terrible
wrong
tokill
suchanold
friend,
he
replied
that
hehadexecuted
notanoldfriendbutanew
enemy.
AmanlikeCastruccioknows
only
forceandself—interest.Whenthere-
bellion
began,
toenditand
place
oneself
athis
mercy
wasthemostdan—
gerouspossible
move.EvenonceStefanodi
Poggio
hadmadethatfatal
mistake,however,
hestillhad
options:
He
could
haveoffered
money
to
Castruccio,
couldhavemade
promises
forthe
future,
couldhave
pointed
outwhatthe
Poggios
couldstillcontributetoCastruccio’s
power-their
in-
fluence
withthemostinfluentialfamiliesof
Rome,
for
example,
andthe
greatmarriagethey
couldhavebrokered.
InsteadStefano
broughtup
the
past,
anddebtsthatcarriedno
obliga-
tion.Not
only
isamannot
obliged
tobe
grateful,gratitude
isoftenaterri-
bleburdenthathe
gladly
discards.AndinthiscaseCastruccioridhimself
ofhis
obligations
tothe
Poggiosbyeliminating
the
Poggios.
OBSERVANCEOFTHELAW
In4-33
B.C.,
just
beforethe
Peloponnesian
War,
theislandof
Corcyra
(later
called
Corfu)
andtheGreek
city~state
of
Corinth
stoodonthebrinkofcon-
flict.Both
parties
sentambassadorstoAthensto
try
towinovertheAtheni~
anstotheirside.Thestakeswere
high,
sincewhoeverhadAthensonhis
sidewassuretowin.Andwhoeverwonthewarwould
certainlygive
the
defeatedsideno
mercy.
Corcyraspoke
first.Itsambassador
beganbyadmitting
thattheisland
had
never
helped
Athens
before,
and
in
facthad
allieditselfwithAthens’s
enemies.Therewerenotiesof
friendship
or
gratitude
between
Corcyra
andAthens.
Yes,
theambassador
achnitted,
hehadcometoAthensnow
outoffearandconcernfor
Corcyra’ssafety.
The
onlything
hecouldoffer
wasan
alliance
ofmutualinterests.
Corcyra
hada
navyonlysurpassed
in
sizeand
strength by
Athens’s
own;
an
alliance
betweenthetwo
states
wouldcreateaformidable
force,
onethatcouldintimidatetherivalstateof
Sparta.
That,
unfortunately,
wasall
Oorcyra
hadtooffer.
The
representative
from Corinththen
gave
a
brilliant,
passionate
speech,
in
sharp
contrasttothe
dry,
colorless
approach
ofthe
Corcyran.
Hetalkedof
everything
Corinth
had
done
for
Athens
inthe
past.
He
asked
how
it
wouldlooktoAthens’sotherallies
if
the
cityput
an
agreement
with
aformer
enemy
overonewith a
present
friend,
onethathadserved
Athens’sinterest
loyally:Perhaps
thoseallieswouldbreaktheir
agreements
withAthensif
they
sawthattheir
loyalty
wasnotvalued.
Hereferred
to
Hellenic
law,
andthe
needto
repay
Corinthforallits
good
deeds.Hefi-
nally
wentontolistthe
many
servicesCorinthhad
performed
for
Athens,
andthe
importance
of
showing
gratitude
toone’sfriends.
Afterthe
speech,
theAtheniansdebatedtheissueinan
assembly.
On
Mostmenaresothor-
oughlyxubjeciive
that
nothing
really
intermls
zhembu!1hmn.reIw.v.
T/zr,-yalways
think
of
theirowncasnatman
as(war
any
remarkis
made,andtheirwhole
auenukmis
erzgrmxscd
andabvorbedb
y
the
Inerestclmnre
rr:fr:r-
mureto
anything
which
uffct/s
them
personally,
beitneversorcrnoze.
/\R1‘liUR
S(:xmm«‘r~:uALrr-.12.
l7XX—l8tI(l
LAWI3 97