274 Erik R. Thomas, Norman J. Lass, and Jeannine Carpenter
Table 12.3 Multiple Regression Results By Listener Group and Sentence Type (continued)
b. p values and coef¿ cient signs for North Carolina European American listeners (n=33; coef¿ cient
sign shown in parentheses when p.10)
Treatment speaker
sex
mean F0 max F0 CPP vowel
quality
nu=nucleus,
gl=glide
standard
deviation
of F0
R^2
unmod /æ/ male .831 .938 .995 .096 (+) .655 .956
unmod /o/ male .663 .992 .864 nu .928
gl .875
.684 .791
unmod control male .058 (+) .046 (-) .860 — .900 .956
unmod /æ/ female .884 .057 (-) .249 .015 (+) .325 .978
unmod /o/ female .245 .355 .331 nu .062 (+)
gl .179
.464 .999
unmod control female .056 (+) .095 (-) .058 (-) — .123 .798
mono /æ/ male — — .719 .004 (+) — .871
mono /o/ male — — .049 (-) nu .950
gl .138
—.748
mono control male — — .238 — — .222
mono /æ/ female — — .075 (+) .00005 (+) — .971
mono /o/ female — — .930 nu .0003 (+)
gl .093 (+)
—.992
mono control female — — .289 — — .184
schwa /æ/ male .045 (+) .117 .306 — .474 .960
schwa /o/ male .519 .252 .678 — .057 (-) .923
schwa control male .563 .567 .691 — .429 .725
schwa /æ/ female .449 .103 .560 — .856 .774
schwa /o/ female .130 .617 .298 — .152 .823
schwa control female .923 .488 .295 — .409 .594
(continued)