A New Architecture for Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series)

FG from its inception 27 formational component of generative grammar can make to general linguistic theory” (Dik 1966: 410). Sec ...

28 Matthew P. Anstey guishable part of a construction type in relation to other parts of the same construction”.^5 What precisel ...

FG from its inception 29 (2) ile(s (sdecl (SUBJ (np (npsg (DET(art(the) )+HEAD (nsg (man) ) ) ) )+PRED (fv (fvintr (fvintr past ...

30 Matthew P. Anstey he writes, “In spite of differences in formulation and elaboration, many semantic theorists agree in that t ...

FG from its inception 31 FG 1 - 1978 to 1989 5.1. The Theoretical Framework The first monograph devoted entirely to Functional ...

32 Matthew P. Anstey concept of FG 1 is essentially the combining of semantic, syntactic and pragmatic functions with predicate ...

FG from its inception 33 In this case, ω covers term operators, ωxi defines the universe of poten- tial referents, restricted fi ...

34 Matthew P. Anstey represent the transition from intention to articulation? Alternatively, is this a procedural model? If so, ...

FG from its inception 35 not only the semantics of nuclear predications, but also the semantics of fully developed linguistic ex ...

36 Matthew P. Anstey structure as semantic relations, thereby eliminating the need for an abstract NP structure;^17 (c) defermen ...

FG from its inception 37 (1973b: 835) himself remarks, the “semantic content of a linguistic expres- sion” is “the information w ...

38 Matthew P. Anstey ent(s) of the term in question.” This suggests that neither type of UR pre- sented above represents the pra ...

FG from its inception 39 problematic course that Dik sought to navigate in this regard. The problems begin when Dik makes a cruc ...

40 Matthew P. Anstey fluential in psycholinguistics. On the other hand, it is arguably the case that FG’s commitment to formaliz ...

FG from its inception 41 Not only is the clause layered horizontally, it is now also layered verti- cally, the two layers signif ...

42 Matthew P. Anstey (Dik 1997a, 1997b) is not that different from FG 2. So, assuming the reader is familiar with FG2/3, we will ...

FG from its inception 43 (18) (ςi: [ ω 3 [ ω 2 [ ω 1 predN (xi) θ 1 ] θ 2 ] θ 3 ]) Hengeveld (1992) is an important article. Fir ...

44 Matthew P. Anstey 6.2.2. Some additional problems Hengeveld’s 1997 model is still quite different from FG 4. We need to re- v ...

FG from its inception 45 FG 4 : The New Architecture We are now in a position to consider our three introductory questions in ...

46 Matthew P. Anstey 7.1.2. Does it address objections raised against previous models? Focusing on the problem of structure (PR1 ...