The Evolution of Operational Art. From Napoleon to the Present

(Tina Meador) #1
defined as ‘a process for obtaining a desired strategic outcome or effect on the enemy
through the synergistic and cumulative application of the full range of military and
non-military capabilities at all levels of conflict’. Lieutenant Colonel Allen W. Batsche-
let,Effects-Based Operations: A New Operational Model?(Carlisle, PA: US Army War
College, 2002), 2.


  1. The Winograd Commission’s Interim Report, 49. For a recent criticism of EBO, see
    General John N. Mattis, ‘Assessment of Effects Based Operations’,http://smallwars-
    journal.com/documents/usjfcomebomemo.pdf
    .

  2. Sean J. A. Edwards,Swarming on the Battlefield: Past, Present, and Future(Santa
    Monica, CA: RAND, 2000); John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt,Swarming and the
    Future of Conflict(Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2000); Amir Rapaport,Friendly Fire(Tel
    Aviv: Maariv, 2007) [Hebrew], 81.

  3. Kober, ‘The IDF in the Second Lebanon War’, 29.

  4. Amnon Barzilai, ‘[Chief of the IDF’s Technology and Logistics Branch General Udi]
    Adam’s Technological Revolution’,Haaretz, 2 April 2004.

  5. Barnea and Shiffer, interview with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

  6. Amos Harel, ‘A Flawed Operational Conception’,Haaretz, 10 December 2006.

  7. Amira Lam, ‘We Betrayed Our Constituency’,Yediot Aharonot Weekend Supplement,
    1 September 2006.

  8. Ari Shavit, interview with General (ret.) Yossi Peled,Haaretz Weekend Supplement,
    20 October 2006.

  9. Kober, ‘Israeli Military Thinking as Reflected inMaarachotArticles’, 156.

  10. Aharon Zeevi, ‘Aviv Ne’urim: The Vision and Its Implementation’,Maarachot, 358
    (April 1998), 3–6.

  11. Kober, ‘What Happened to Israeli Military Thinking?’


194 The Evolution of Operational Art

Free download pdf