Justice among Nations. A History of International Law - Stephen C. Neff

(backadmin) #1

  1. Venezuela Constitution, Apr. 27, 1881, 72 BSFP 977, art. 10.

  2. Lars Schoultz, Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy toward Latin
    America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 272– 75.

  3. See, to this eff ect, Tinoco Arbitration (Great Britain v. Costa Rica), 1 RIAA 369
    (1923), 380– 82.

  4. See John Stuart Mill, “A Few Words on Non- Intervention,” in Collected Works of
    John Stuart Mill, vol. 21, ed. John M. Robson, 215– 57 (Toronto: University of Toronto
    Press, 1984 [1867]).

  5. John Stuart Mill, “Vindication of the French Revolution of February 1848,” in
    ibid., vol. 20, 340– 48; and Mill, “Non- Intervention,” 123– 24.

  6. For the agreement between Austria and Rus sia for Rus sian aid, see Austria-
    Russia, Convention on the Reception of Rus sian Troops, June 10, 1849, 103 CTS 93.

  7. Mill, “Non- Intervention,” 121– 24.

  8. Institute of International Law, Rights and Duties of Foreign Powers as Regards
    the Established and Recognized Governments in Case of Insurrection (1900), art.
    2(2), in James Brown Scott, ed., Resolutions of the Institute of International Law Deal-
    ing with the Law of Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1916), 157– 59. On the
    Institute of International Law, see Chapter 8.

  9. See Chapter 6.

  10. For future developments regarding liberalism, see Chapter 9.

  11. On Herder, see Hans Kohn, Th e Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and
    Background (New York: Macmillan, 1961), 427– 51; Friedrich Meineke, Historism: Th e
    Rise of a New Historical Outlook, trans J. E. Anderson (London: Routledge and Kegan
    Paul, 1972), 295– 372; Sonia Sikka, Herder on Humanity and Cultural Diff erence: Enlight-
    ened Relativism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011); and Frederick C. Beiser,
    Th e German Historicist Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 98– 116.

  12. See Martens, Tra i t é , vol. 1, 192, identifying Madame de Staël as a progenitor of
    the nationality school.

  13. Bluntschli, Th eory of the State, 71.

  14. Giuseppe Mazzini, Th e Duties of Man and Other Essays, trans. Ella Noyes,
    Th omas Okey, and L. Martineau (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1907), 53.

  15. Ibid., 55.

  16. See Pasquale Mancini, Della nazionalità come fondamento del dritto delle genti
    (Turin: Eredi Botta, 1851).

  17. Angelo Piero Sereni, Th e Italian Conception of International Law (New York: Co-
    lumbia University Press, 1943), 162– 63. See also IDI Annuaire, vol. 1 (1874), 123– 68.

  18. Giorgio del Vecchio, Philosophy of Law, 8th ed., trans. Th omas Owen Martin
    (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 1953), 361.

  19. Sereni, Italian Conception, 194.

  20. On Fiore’s support for the nationality theory, see Enrico Catellani, “Les maîtres de
    l’école italienne du droit international au XIXe siècle,” 46 RdC 705– 826 (1933), 732– 36.


524 Notes to Pages 277–282

Free download pdf