In order for 2 to be an eigenfunction, the two terms in parentheses
following the last equal sign must be identical. Thus,
!I!SJISþ 2 JIStan¼!Iþ!SJISþ 2 JIS=tan,
2 tan!ðÞI!S 2 JIS 1 tan^2
¼0,
2 tan
1 tan^2
¼
2 JIS
ðÞ!I!S
,
tanð 2 Þ¼
2 JIS
ðÞ!I!S
,
½ 2 : 162
which completes the demonstration, becauseis defined according to
[2.157]. By inspection,
E 2 ¼^12 ðÞ!I!SJISþ 2 JIStan, ½ 2 : 163
which is easily shown to be equal to [2.159] by solving [2.157] for tan.
By comparing [2.138] and [2.156], the transformation matrixUthat
converts the product basis into the strong coupling basis (and
diagonalizes the Hamiltonian) is given by
U¼
10 00
0 cos sin 0
0 sin cos 0
00 01
2
(^66)
(^64)
3
(^77)
75 : ½^2 :^164
In the limit of weak scalar coupling,¼0 and the wavefunctions of
the two energy levels
(^) and
(^) are independent. The weak coupling
Hamiltonian simplifies to
H¼!IIzþ!SSzþ 2 JISIzSz: ½ 2 : 165
To calculate evolution of the density operator under the weak coupling
Hamiltonian, the effect of the operation
ðtÞ¼exp½i 2 IzSzð 0 Þexp½ ½i 2 IzSz 2 : 166
for ¼JISt must be calculated. The derivation is similar to the
derivation of the rotation operators; thus,
exp½¼i 2 IzSz Eþi 2 IzSz^122 ðÞ 2 IzSz^2 þ...: ½ 2 : 167
64 CHAPTER 2 THEORETICALDESCRIPTION OFNMR SPECTROSCOPY