The Globe and Mail - 08.04.2020

(WallPaper) #1

WEDNESDAY,APRIL8,2020 | THEGLOBEANDMAIL O B11


EYEONEQUITIESDAVIDLEEDER


INTERFOR(IFP-TSX)
CLOSE$6.77,UP6¢


MULLENGROUP(MTL-TSX)
CLOSE$4.48,UP43¢

PASONSYSTEM(PSI-TSX)
CLOSE$6.20,UNCHANGED

PEOPLE(PEO-TSXVENTURE)
CLOSE$7.60,DOWN3¢

DECIBEL(DB-TSXVENTURE)
CLOSE7¢,UNCHANGED

Earnings uncertainty stemming
from the impact of the spread of
COVID-19 prompted Raymond
James analyst Daryl Swetlishoff to
adjust his valuation methodolo-
gy for Canadian forest-products
companies, leading him to lower
Interfor Corp.to “outperform”
from “strong buy.”
Target:His target for Interfor
shares dropped to $9.50 from
$16.50. The consensus on the
Street is $13.75.


Though its macro outlook re-
mains “uncertain,” Industrial Al-
liance Securities analyst Elias Fos-
colos raisedMullen Group Ltd.to
“speculative buy” from “hold,”
citing its “survivable balance
sheet, and a resilient business
model that is attributable to di-
versification and cost manage-
ment.” “We believe that the stock
has become sufficiently discount-
ed to justify upgrading,” he said.
Target:Mr. Foscolos maintained
a $6.50 target. Consensus is $8.21.

Mr. Foscolos also raisedPason
Systems Inc.to “speculative buy”
from “hold,” believing it possess-
es a strong enough balance sheet
to “survive a downturn of pro-
longed duration.” “We believe the
stock has the potential to deliver
solid returns at the current price,”
he said.
Target:He kept an $8.50 target,
which falls below the $12.75 con-
sensus.

Pointing to “uncertainty with the
unemployment outlook and du-
ration of the pandemic,” Desjar-
dins Securities analyst Gary Ho
felt compelled to lowerPeople
Corp.to “hold” from “buy.” Mr.
Ho said he remains in “favour its
solid management team and re-
cession-resilient business mod-
el,” however he was surprised by
the timing of its $20-million equi-
ty raise.
Target:Mr. Ho cut his target to
$8.50 from $12. Consensus is
$10.83.

Canaccord Genuity analyst Kim-
berly Hedlin loweredDecibel
Cannabis Company Inc., former-
ly known as Westleaf Inc., to
“hold” from “speculative buy.
“The reduction is largely due to
DB’s premium value proposition
in the context of a weak economy,
along with expected licensing de-
lays, both of which could create
challenges in gaining market
share,” she said.
Target:Her target slid to 15 cents
from 55 cents. Consensus is 35
cents.

WHATAREWELOOKINGFOR?


Companies in one of the hardest
hit sectors in the current CO-
VID-19 shutdown – consumer dis-
cretionary – through a lens of
strong labour and supply chain
management practices.


THESCREEN


Using FactSet’s Universal Screen-
ing, we created a universe of
stocks from the GICS consumer
discretionary sector, representing
the largest Canadian- and U.S.-
listed companies selling nones-
sential consumer goods and ser-
vicesÝ 77 companies fit these cri-
teria.
We then used labour manage-
ment scores from MSCI ESG Re-
search, a leading provider of envi-
ronmental, social andgovern-
ance data, reports and ratings, to
compare the recoveries of our
universe, from the recent lowest
point of the markets on March 23
to the present. Supply chain man-
agement and employee well-be-
ing are two components of the la-


bour management score, where
the highest score is 10.

MOREABOUTFACTSET
FactSet is a leading global finan-
cial data and technology compa-
ny. Our superior suite of content,
analytics and workflow solutions
covers the entire portfolio life cy-
cle and offers actionable insights
for asset managers and invest-
ment professionals around the
world.

WHATWEFOUND
Companies that scored the best
in terms of labour management
practices had more volatile stock
prices than their peers. They also

had lower credit ratings, which
may help explain why they ini-
tially dropped so dramatically
during the first half of March.
When we looked at performance
later in the month ÀMarch 23-
April 6Á, we then saw a sharper-
than-average rebound. The entire
consumer discretionary sector in
Canada and the United States ex-
perienced a recovery of 14 per
cent over the specified time peri-
od, while the top 10 companies in
our table saw an average increase
of 22.3 per cent. The bottom 10
stocks in our universe returned
only 9.4 per cent.
What explains this differenceÌ
It is hard to say with so many fac-
tors in play, such as solvency, but
labour management is under in-

creased scrutiny. There is increas-
ing focus today on how compa-
nies treat staff and how able they
are to deal with interrupted sup-
ply chains. Those that do well on
both fronts could therefore be
seen as being well-positioned to
benefit when consumer demand
begins to rebound from a combi-
nation of employee Àand custom-
erÁ loyalty – i.e. rewarding good
behaviour – and effective stew-
ardship of supply in the long
term.
For example,Whirlpool Corp.
had the biggest price rebound,
climbing 44 per cent between
March 23 and April 6. The compa-
ny bottomed on March 23 and
provided an update on business
operations the following day, in-

cluding a focus on its operating
liquidity, which may have con-
tributed to its sharp rebound. The
nature of its business – i.e. ap-
pliances where sales depend on
both a well-functioning supply
chain and consumer choice – also
points to strong labour manage-
ment practices Àwhere Whirlpool
came in thirdÁ being a potential
long-term benefit.
The company in our top 10 for
labour management that per-
formed worst wasExpedia Group
Inc., which only recovered 3.9 per
cent. This drop makes sense given
the collapse in travel.
Our conclusionÌ It is too soon
to say whether strong labour
management practices have a di-
rect effect on stock price perform-
ance as the coronavirus crisis
drags on. Factors such as liquidity
or a complete collapse in con-
sumer demand, at least in the
case of Expedia, seem to matter
more, at least right now. There are
some indications, however, that
companies that manage their
teams and supply chains respon-
sibly just might have a long-term
advantage.
The information in this article
is not investment advice. FactSet
assumes no liability for any con-
sequence relating directly or indi-
rectly to any action or inaction
taken based on the information
contained above.

Lookingforgemsinabeaten-downsector


Selectconsumerdiscretionarystocks

COMPANY TICKER

MKT.CAP.
($BIL.)*

RECENT
CLOSE($)*

LABOURMGT.
SCORE**

PRICERTN.
(%)MARCH23
-APRIL6

PRICERTN.
(%)FEB.19
-APRIL6

YTDPRICE
RTN.(%)

1YPRICE
RTN.(%)

DIV.
YLD.(%)
HasbroInc. HAS-Q 12.9 100.70 8.8 37.3 -27.1 -32.6 -17.7 3.8
BestBuyCo.Inc. BBY-N 19.4 85.07 8.6 18.7 -33.9 -31.5 -19.6 3.7
WhirlpoolCorp. WHR-N 7.3 130.81 7.5 44.0 -37.2 -37.3 -32.0 5.2
D.R.HortonInc. DHI-N 16.6 52.12 7.0 24.7 -40.4 -30.1 -15.4 1.9
Tiffany&Co. TIF-N 21.9 181.27 7.0 5.3 -4.5 -4.1 19.2 1.8
ExpediaGroupInc. EXPE-Q 9.2 74.72 6.9 3.9 -56.7 -51.1 -56.9 2.6
UnderArmourInc. UAA-N 4.6 12.71 6.6 11.5 -45.7 -58.4 -58.8 0.0
NVRInc. NVR-N 12.3 3,806.45 6.5 23.7 -32.1 -29.3 -6.2 0.0
StarsGroupInc. TSGI-T 7.6 27.98 6.3 27.5 -16.3 -17.4 10.9 0.0
GildanActivewear GIL-T 3.9 19.50 5.8 26.2 -46.1 -49.2 -60.2 4.2
*MarketcapandrecentcloseshowninCAD;percentagepricechangesinlocalcurrency.DataasofApril6.**MSCIESG,LaborManage-
mentKeyIssuescores.Source:FactSet

SHIRLEYLI


NUMBERCRUNCHER


Clientsolutionsmanager,Canada,
forFactSet


A big second-day rally in North
American stocks suddenly van-
ished by the close of trading Tues-
day, undercut by another plunge
in the price of oil and investor
concerns that markets were reco-
vering too quickly on only tenta-
tive signs of progress in the battle
against the coronavirus.
The SPP 500 closed down 0.2
per cent, and the SPPàTSC Com-
posite Index ended with a slight
gain of 0.1 per cent. Both indexes
were up as much as 3.5 per cent
earlier in the day.
The market’s gains faded as the
price of U.S. crude oil abruptly
flipped from a gain to a steep loss
of more than 9 per cent.
It dampened what had been an
ebullient day for markets world-
wide, following up on Monday’s 7-
per-cent surge for the SPP 500 and
5.1-per-cent gain for the TSC on
encouraging signs that the pan-
demic may be close to levelling off
in some of the hardest-hit areas of
the world.
Even though economists say a
punishing recession is inevitable,
investors this week have recently
begun to look ahead to when
economies will reopen from their
medically induced coma. A peak
in new infections would offer
some clarity about how long the
recession may last and how deep
it will be.
Investors could then, finally,
envision the other side of the eco-
nomic shutdown, after author-
ities forced businesses to halt in
hopes of slowing the spread of the
virus. In the meantime,govern-
ments around the world are talk-
ing about pumping trillions of
dollars more of aid for the econo-
my.
Many professional investors
say they’ve been wary of the re-
cent upsurge and expect more
volatility ahead. The SPP 500 has
rallied nearly 19 per cent since hit-


ting a low on March 23, though it’s
still down 21.5 per cent from its re-
cord set in February. The TSC is
still down more than 24 per cent
from its record high.
“There’s no guarantee that the
worst is behind us, yet traders be-
lieve that at least there is some
short-term money to be made,”
said Sam Stovall, chief investment
strategist at CFRA.
Oil prices have been even more
volatile than the stock market in
recent weeks as demand has dried
up for energy amid a global econ-
omy weakened by the coronavi-
rus outbreak. Russia and Saudi
Arabia have also been locked in a
price war, refusing to cut produc-
tion sharply even as the world is
awash in excess oil.
U.S. President Donald Trump
said last week that he hoped and
expected the two sides could
agree on production cutbacks,
which helped prices spurt higher
temporarily. But investors still
aren’t convinced about a deal, and
benchmark U.S. crude oil fell
US$2.45, or 9.4 per cent, to settle at
US$23.63 a barrel.
Earlier in the trading day, stock
indexes in Europe and Asia
climbed after China, the first
country to lock down wide swaths
of its economy to slow the spread
of the virus, reported no new
deaths over the past 24 hours.
Investors also see signals that
the number of daily infections
and deaths may be close to peak-
ing or plateauing in Spain, Italy
and New York. The number of dai-
ly deaths rose in New York, the
centre of the U.S. outbreak, but
other statistics were more encou-
raging, including the average
number of people hospitalized
each day. COVID-19 has already
claimed at least 81,000 lives
around the world.
More economic misery is also
on the horizon. Economists ex-

pect a report on Thursday to show
that five million Americans ap-
plied for unemployment benefits
last week as layoffs sweep the
country. That would bring the to-
tal to nearly 15 million over the
past three weeks. Analysts also ex-
pect big companies in coming
weeks to report their worst quar-
ter of profit declines in more than
a decade.
But central banksand govern-
ments are promising massive
amounts of aid to prop up the
economy.
Japan’sgovernment on Tues-
day formally announced a 108 tril-
lion yen À$1.4-trillionÁ package for
the world’s third-largest econo-
my.
In the U.S., the White House is
seeking an additional US$250-bil-
lion for a program to help small
businesses, which was part of the
US$2.2-trillion rescue package
Congress approved last month.
There is hope that clinical data
on potential treatments for the
new coronavirus could help sus-
tain the market bounce, as inves-
tors look for signs that authorities
may be able to stabilize the pan-
demic. Highly anticipated data for
a Gilead Sciences Inc. experimen-
tal antiviral drug are expected lat-
er this month. Analysts are also
awaiting results in the near-term
for products already approved for
other conditions from companies
such as Roche Holding and Rege-
neron Pharmaceuticals.
While experts estimate an ap-
proved vaccine could be at least a
year away, progress toward treat-
ments that benefit some CO-
VID-19 patients could help inves-
tors gauge when the epidemic
could come under control and
some economic activity might re-
sume.

ASSOCIATEDPRESS,REUTERS
ANDGLOBESTAFF

StockrallyfizzlesasU.S.


crudepricessuddenlyplunge


REPORTONBUSINESS |

T


he experience of stock market crashes going back to
1987 suggests investors are going to need to stay
patient while they wait for their portfolios to recov-
er from the latest plunge.
The pandemic-driven plunge in stocks is unique – other
modern-day market crashes have been due to events in
financial markets or the economy. But looking at those
market downturns can still provide some sense of what lies
ahead for the sort of investor who holds a balanced port-
folio of stocks and bonds.
The Britain-based firm Asset Risk Consultants ÀARCÁ has
taken a look at how a Canadian-dollar “steady growth” in-
vestor with 60 per cent to 70 per cent of their assets in
stocks would have fared in six market declines – 1987, 2000,
2007, 2015, 2018 and the recent decline caused by the CO-
VID-19 outbreak.
Maximum losses in the 2015 and 2018 declines came in
around 10 per cent from peak to trough and were more or
less reversed in nine to 12 months. “In retrospect, these were
sentiment-driven declines that were reversed as the global
economy continued to expand and companies continued to
thrive,” ARC said in a recent report.
The 2000 bursting of the tech bubble and the 2007 fi-
nancial crisis were much worse. In both cases, the economic
damage that occurred at the time meant that it took the
steady growth portfolio more than three years to reverse its
losses.
ARC says the 2020 decline so far resembles 1987 in that it
hit hard and happened quickly. But recovery from the 1987
crash was relatively fast. Within two years, losses had been
reversed.
Recovery from the 2020 market crash looks like it will
take longer than that. “The consensus is that containing
COVID-19 will cause considerable economic damage, not-
withstanding the support packages being promised by gov-
ernments,” ARC said in its report. “That suggests that it may
take several years for financial markets to recover their pre-
vious peaks. We may well be only around 50 days into a
1,000-day drawdown.”
ARC says the worst course of action is to sell and lock in
losses unless absolutely necessary. It also said that rebalanc-
ing – selling better-performing bonds to buy beaten-down
stocks – should allow for a faster recovery than a portfolio
left untended.

Historysuggestsit’stime


topractisepatience,but


isthattherightapproach


amidthisuniquedownturn?


ROB
CARRICK

OPINION
Free download pdf