Public Speaking

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

304 RefeRences


304



  1. Hermann-Nehdi, A. (2010, May).
    Whole brain thinking: Ignore it at your
    peril. T+D, 64 (5), 36–42.

  2. Jorgensen-Earp, C. (n.d.). “Making
    other arrangements”: Alternative
    patterns of disposition [Unpublished
    course handout]. Lynchburg, VA:
    Lynchburg College.


Chapter 12



  1. Berman, J. (2012, February 28). How
    to talk like a local. ABC Nightly News.
    Retrieved from http://www.abcnews.go.com/
    WTN/video/dictionary-celebrates0di-
    versity-language015812788.

  2. Kimble, J. (2006). Lifting the fog
    of legalese. Durham, NC: Durham
    Academic Press, p. xii. Retrieved from
    http://www.cap-press.com/pdf/1549.pdf.

  3. Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics:
    An introduction to language and society
    (4th ed.). New York: NY: Penguin
    Books.

  4. Gozzi, R. (1990). New words and a
    changing American culture. Columbia,
    SC: University of South Carolina Press.

  5. Cited in R. Engnell. (2010). Senior
    capstone: Ethical and spiritual dimen-
    sions of communication. George Fox
    University, Newberg, OR.

  6. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought,
    and reality. Quotations from Benjamin
    Lee Whorf. Retrieved from
    http://mtsu32.mtsu.edu:11072/
    Whorf/blwquotes.html.

  7. Oxford English Dictionary. (2014,
    March). What’s new: March 2014
    update. Oxford University Press.
    Retrieved from http://public.oed.com/
    whats-new/.

  8. ESPN Classic. (2002, August 16).
    Lakers broadcaster Chick Hearn dies
    at 85. Associated Press. Retrieved
    from https://espn.go.com/classic/
    obit/s/2002/0805/1414492.html.

  9. Gozzi, New words.

  10. Range. (2002). Oxford dictionaries.
    Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.
    com/definition/english/range.

  11. Kluger, J. (2013, January 15). The end
    of an epithet: How hate speech dies.
    Time. Retrieved from http://healthland.
    time.com/2013/01/25/the-end-of-an-
    epithet-how-hate-speech-dies/.

  12. Delwiche, A. (2002, September 29).
    Propaganda: Euphemisms. Propaganda
    Critic. Retrieved from http://www.propagan-
    dacritic.com/articles/ct.wg.euphemism.
    html.

  13. Dialects doing well. (1998). InSCIght
    on Apnet. Retrieved from http://www.apnet.
    com/inscight/02181009/graphb.htm.

  14. Reider, J. (2008). The Word of the Lord
    is upon me: The righteous performance
    of Martin Luther King, Jr. Cambridge,
    MA: Belknap Press of Harvard
    University Press.

  15. Quoted in Oral Communication
    Center. (2011). Spoken vs. written
    language. Hamilton College, Hamilton,
    Clinton, NY. Retrieved from http://www.
    hamilton.edu/oralcommunication/
    spoken-language-vs-written-language.

  16. DeVito, J. A. (1965). Comprehension
    factors in oral and written discourse
    of skilled communicators. Speech
    Monographs, 32 , 124–128.

  17. Ferraro, V., & Palmer, K. C. (n.d.).
    Differences between oral and written
    communication. Retrieved from
    http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/
    speech/-differences.htm.

  18. Stern, J. D. (2009, August). Making
    smarter movies. Speech delivered
    June 20, 2009, to the Los Angeles Film
    Festival, Los Angeles, CA. Vital Speeches
    of the Day, 75 (8), 347–352.

  19. Greidanus, S. (2007). Preaching Christ
    from Genesis: Foundations for expository
    sermons. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  20. Anderson, J. W. (1991). A comparison
    of Arab and American conceptions of
    “effective persuasion.” In L. A. Samovar
    & R. E. Porter (Eds.). Intercultural
    communication: A reader (5th ed.,
    pp. 96–106). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

  21. Thyne, C. (2012). Stem-cell research
    [Student speech]. George Fox University,
    Newberg, OR.

  22. Lessing, D. (2008, February). Not
    winning the Nobel Prize: Lecture given
    December 7, 2007, to the Nobel Peace
    Prize Committee, Oslo, Norway. Vital
    Speeches of the Day, 74 (2), 72–73.

  23. Reagan, R. (1986, January 31). Address
    on the Challenger disaster. Nationally
    televised speech. Available on http://www.you-
    tube.com/watch?v=gEjXjfxoNXM.

  24. Scherer, J. J. (2010, August). Go for tov:
    Learning to “come home to yourself.”
    Speech delivered May 1, 2010, at the
    commencement ceremony for Roanoke
    College, Salem, VA. Vital Speeches of the
    Day, 76 (8), 351–354.

  25. The first two examples came from
    http://www.americanrhetoric.com.

  26. Lamm, R. D. (2005). How to make an
    environmentalist. Speech delivered


January 27, 2005, at the Thorne
Ecological Institute 50th Anniversary,
Vital Speeches of the Day, 71 (10),
304–306.


  1. Brody, W. J. (2007, November). What’s
    promised, what’s possible. Speech
    delivered September 7, 2007, to the
    National Press Club, Washington, DC.
    Vital Speeches of the Day, 73 (11).

  2. Peters, D. (2000, May). Sweet seduction.
    Chatelaine, 73 (5), 53.

  3. Osborn, M. (1997). The play of
    metaphors. Education, 118 (1), 84–87.

  4. Panelist. (2008, June 12). Life on the Rock
    (Encore). EWTN Television.

  5. Seattle. (1971). The Indian’s night
    promises to be dark. In W. C. Vanderw-
    erth (Ed.), Indian oratory: Famous speeches
    by noted Indian chieftains (pp. 118–122).
    Norman: University of Oklahoma
    Press. (Original work published 1853)

  6. Osborn, M. (1967). Archetypal
    metaphor in rhetoric: The lightdark
    family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53 ,
    115–126. See also Osborn, M. (1977).
    The evolution of the archetypal sea in
    rhetoric and poetic. Quarterly Journal of
    Speech, 63 , 347–363.

  7. Seattle. The Indian’s night.

  8. Blankenship, K. L., & Holtgraves.
    (2005, March). The role of different
    markers of linguistic powerlessness
    in persuasion. Journal of Language and
    Social Psychology, 24 (1), 3–24.
    doi: 10.1177/0261927X04273034.

  9. Blankenship, K. L., & Craig, T. Y. (2007,
    March). Powerless language markers
    and the correspondence bias. Journal of
    Language and Social Psychology, 26 (1),
    28–47. doi: 10.1177/0261927X06296470.

  10. Johannesen, R. L., Valde, K. S., &
    Wheedbee, K. E. (2008). Ethics in
    human communication (6th ed.). Long
    Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

  11. Emory University Department of
    Religion. (2001, December 6). Statement
    on inclusive language. Retrieved from
    http://www.emory.edu/COLLEGE/RELI-
    GION/about/statement.html.

  12. Seiter, J. S., Larsen, J., & Skinner, J.
    (1998). “Handicapped” or “handi-
    capable”? The effects of language about
    persons with disabilities on perceptions
    of source credibility and persuasiveness.
    Communication Reports, 11 (1), 21–31.

  13. Currey, J., & Mumford, K. (2002, Sep-
    tember 18). Just talk: Guide to inclusive
    language. University of Tasmania. Re-
    trieved from http://student.admin.utas.


Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.www.ebook3000.com
Free download pdf