Heuristics and Biases in Audience Decision Making 251191 Maule, J., & Villejoubert, G. (2007). What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning,
13 (1), 25–44.
See n185, Pan & Kosicki (2001).
See n11, Simon & Hayes (1976).
192 Hershey, J. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1980). Prospect theory’s reflection hypothesis: A critical examination.
Organizational Behavior & Human Performance , 25 (3), 395–418.
193 Levin, I. P. (1987). Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 25 (2),
85–86.
Braun, K. A., Gacth, G. J., & Levin, I. P. (1997). Framing effects with differential impact: The role of
attribute salience. Advances in Consumer Research , 24 , 405–411.
Jasper, J. D., Goel, R., Einarson, A., Gallo, M., and Koren, G. (2001). Effects of framing on teratogenic risk
perception in pregnant women. The Lancet, 358 (9289): 1237–1238.
194 Avila, J. (2012, March 7). 70 Percent of Ground Beef at Supermarkets Contains “Pink Slime.” ABC News.
195 Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political
choice. American Political Science Review , 82 , 719–736.
196 McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Cox Jr, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for
alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine , 306 , 1259–1262.
197 Tumulty, K. (1990, September 3). Abortion polls yield contradictory results. Austin American Statesman , A29.
198 Monti, M., Boero, R., Berg, N., Gigerenzer, G., & Martignon, L. (2012). How do common investors
behave? Information search and portfolio choice among bank customers and university students. Mind &
Society , 11 (2), 203–233.
199 Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. (2005). Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference rever-
sals owing to number size framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 98 (1), 54–65.
200 Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. C. (2006). Bonus or rebate? The impact of income framing on spending
and saving. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 19 (3), 213–227.
201 Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations
versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin , 30 (9), 1175–1185.
202 Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Balti-
more: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hilgartner. S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American
Journal of Sociology , 94 , 53–78.
203 Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A con-
structionist approach. American Journal of Sociology , 95 (1), 1–37.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D.(1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B.
Klandermans, H. Kriesi & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across
countries (pp. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
204 Plumm, K. M., Borhart, H., & Weatherly, J. N. (2012). Choose your words wisely: Delay discounting of
differently titled social policy issues. Behavior and Social Issues , 21 , 26–48.
205 Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grass roots organizing. Boston: South End Press.
206 Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H.
Gandy & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world
(pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
207 Keen, J. (1990, August 21). How long will U.S. stay in the gulf? USA Today, pp. 1A, 2A.
208 Westen, D. (2007, p. 36). The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York:
Public Affairs.
209 Van Zant, A. B., & Moore, D. A. (2015). Leaders’ use of moral justifications increases policy support.
Psychological Science , 26 (6), 934–943.
210 Neuman, R., Just, M., & Crigler, A. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political mean-
ing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
211 Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. L
Shaw & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp. 3–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
212 McCombs, M., & Mauro, J. (1977). Predicting newspaper readership from content characteristics. Jour-
nalism Quarterly , 54 (1), 3–49.
213 Tankard, J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991, August). Media frames: Approaches
to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and
Mass Communication, Boston.