Persuasive Communication - How Audiences Decide. 2nd Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

444 References


Trollip, S. R., & Sales, G. (1986). Readability of computer-generated fi ll-justifi ed text. Human Factors, 28 (2),
159–163.
Trönnberg, C. C., & Hemlin, S. (2014). Lending decision making in banks: A critical incident study of loan
offi cers. European Management Journal, 32 (2), 362–372.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identifi cation and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93 (3),
239–257.
Troutman, C. M., & Shanteau, J. (1976). Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute
information? Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (2), 101–106.
Tsai, M. H., & Young, M. J. (2010). Anger, fear, and escalation of commitment. Cognition and Emotion, 24 (6),
962–973.
Tsai, W., Yang, C., Leu, J., Lee, Y., & Yang, C. (2013). An integrated group decision making support model for
corporate fi nancing decisions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22 (6), 1103–1127.
Tsay, C. J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 110 (36), 14580–14585.
Tsay, C. J. (2014). The vision heuristic: Judging music ensembles by sight alone. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 124 (1), 24–33.
Tse, D., Langston, R. F., Kakeyama, M., Bethus, I., Spooner, P. A., Wood, E. R.,... & Morris, R. G. (2007).
Schemas and memory consolidation. Science, 316 (5821), 76–82.
Tse, D., Takeuchi, T., Kakeyama, M., Kajii, Y., Okuno, H., Tohyama, C.,... & Morris, R. G. (2011). Schema-
dependent gene activation and memory encoding in neocortex. Science, 333 (6044), 891–895.
Tumulty, K. (1990, September 3). Abortion polls yield contradictory results. Austin American Statesman, p. A29.
Turner, E. A., & Rommetveit, R. (1968). Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of
Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7 (2), 543–548.
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76 (1), 31–48.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79 (4), 281–299.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76 (2), 105–110.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive
Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157),
1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemata in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.),
Progress in social psychology (pp. 49–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science,
211 (4481), 453–458.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in prob-
ability judgment. Psychological Review, 90 (4), 293–315.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1988). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa
& A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 167–192). New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A., & Sattath, S. (1979). Preference trees. Psychological Review, 86 (6), 542–573.
Tversky, A., & Shafi r, E. (1992). Choice under confl ict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Sci-
ence, 3 (6), 358–361.
Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science,
30 (9), 1051–1066.
Tyler, L. K., Wright, P., Randall, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2010). Reorganization
of syntactic processing following left-hemisphere brain damage: Does right-hemisphere activity preserve
function? Brain, 133 (11), 3396–3408.
Uggerslev, K. L., Fassina, N. E., & Kraichy, D. (2012). Recruiting through the stages: A meta-analytic test of
predictors of applicant attraction at different stages of the recruiting process. Personnel Psychology, 65 (3),
597–660.
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria redefi ning merit to justify discrimination. Psy-
chological Science, 16 (6), 474–480.
Uleman, J. S. (1999). Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In S. Chaiken & Y.
Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 141–160). New York: Guilford Press.
Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as fl exible interpreters: Evidence and issues
from spontaneous trait inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28,
pp. 179–211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency infl uence eye movements
when inspecting pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (11), 1931–1949.
Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candid, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Mapping implied body actions in the human motor
system. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26 (30), 7942–7949.

Free download pdf