Persuasive Communication - How Audiences Decide. 2nd Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1
References 443

Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert
status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49 (4), 464–477.
Thomason, S. J., Weeks, M., Bernardin, H. J., & Kane, J. (2011). The differential focus of supervisors and
peers in evaluations of managerial potential. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19 (1), 82–97.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive
Psychology, 9 (1), 77–110.
Thorsteinson, T. J., Breier, J., Atwell, A., Hamilton, C., & Privette, M. (2008). Anchoring effects on perfor-
mance judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107 (1), 29–40.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal
behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3), 558–568.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of
specifi c emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (6), 973–988.
Timmermans, D., & Vlek, C. (1996). Effects on decision quality of supporting multi-attribute evaluation in
groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68 (2), 158–170.
Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and
group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (1985). Individual and group reward allocation decisions in two situational con-
texts: Effects of relative need and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (5), 1148–1161.
Tindale, R. S., Heath, L., Edwards, J., Posavac, E. J., Bryant, F. B., Suarez-Balcazar, Y.,... & Myers, J. (1998).
Theory and research on small groups. New York: Plenum Press.
Tindale, R. S., Kameda, T., & Hinsz, V. (2003). Group decision making: Review and integration. In M. A.
Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 381–403). London: Sage.
Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory. Group Processes &
Intergroup Relations, 5 (1), 5–18.
Tindale, R. S., Sheffey, S., & Scott, L. A. (1993). Framing and group decision-making: Do cognitive changes
parallel preference changes? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55 (3), 470–485.
Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and asym-
metric social infl uence processes in small groups. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group
behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 81–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Tinker, M. A. (1965). Bases for effective reading. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Tinker, M. A., & Paterson, D. G. (1928). Infl uence of type form on speed of reading. Journal Of Applied Psychology,
12 (4), 359–368.
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1991). An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids
on decision making strategies. Information Systems Research, 2 (2), 87–115.
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict
election outcomes. Science, 308 (5728), 1623–1626.
Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The effi ciency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (6), 549–562.
Tolley, B. S., & Bogart, L. (1994). How readers process newspaper advertising. In E. M. Clark, T. C. Brock &
D. W. Stewart (Eds.), Attention, attitude, and affect in response to advertising (pp. 69–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Law-
rence Erlbaum Associates.
Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. I. The positive affects. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: The roles of elaboration
and thought-confi dence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (12), 1700–1712.
Tosi, H. (1971). Organizaton stress as a moderator of the relationship between infl uence and role response.
Academy of Management Journal, 14 , 7–20.
Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in profes-
sional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (6), 848–859.
Totterdell, P., Kellett, S., Teuchmann, K., & Briner, R. B. (1998). Evidence of mood linkage in work groups.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6), 1504–1515.
Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measure-
ment. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 299–314.
Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: The infl uence of visual versus verbal depiction
on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 993–1015.
Townsend, M. A. (1980). Schema activation in memory for prose. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12 (1), 49–53.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2008). The automaticity of emotion recognition. Emotion, 8 (1), 81–95.
Treisman, A. M., & Davies, A. (1973). Divided attention to ear and eye. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and
performance IV (pp. 101–117). London: Academic Press.
Treisman, A. M., & Geffen, G. (1967). Selective attention: Perception or response? The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 19 (1), 1–17.

Free download pdf