helped greatly in that. And the way things were set up at the laboratory, you were encouraged to publish- or you perished in that environment. My in fact, it was just like a university: you published
supervisors told me early my writing skills again were not very good. They helped me with that –
they gave me their own time, their own mentoring, and top of that they sent me to courses that helped
greatly.
Researcher: was there something about emotional intelligence that you learned from your mentors?
(^) R9: Well, they were models, you know. You saw
how they managed; how they dealt with people. And so they were role models. I always tried to pick
things tcareer. I incorporated them into my own work style.hat they did – that I found helpful to my
(^) Publish
(^)
Supervisors
MentorClasses (^)
(^)
(^)
(^) Role models
Interpersonal
(^) Work style
(^)
(^)
SUPERVISE
MENTORINGDEVELOPMENT (^)
(^)
(^)
(^) MENTORING
EIOTHERS
(^) LEADERSHIP
Interview question: Why did that experience matter?
Subject Response Initial Coding In Vivo Coding Descriptive Coding
A2 (5 second pause) I would say throughout my life I’ve probably always been slightly out of step. And
there’s probably a whole lot of feeling uncomfortable being out of step when you want to
identify with an organization. And I think one; it allowed me to come to terms with being out of step
- that I’ I mean I think one of the bumper stickers on me is m perceived as an out-of-the-box thinker.
And I found that as traditional as the (culture is, it does also embrace creativity and organization)
imagination. And so also recognized that I was giving my heart and soul – it allowed me to be me but
to an organization, even though I looked nothing
(^) Out of step
(^)
Identity
Reputation
(^)
(^) Heart and soul
(^)
(^)
(^)
(^)
(^)
(^)
(^) PERSONALITY
(^)
SELFAWARE
SELFAWARE
(^)
(^) EIVALUE