BLBS102-c45 BLBS102-Simpson March 21, 2012 14:38 Trim: 276mm X 219mm Printer Name: Yet to Come
45
Biosensors for Sensitive Detection of
Agricultural Contaminants, Pathogens
and Food-Borne Toxins
Barry Byrne, Edwina Stack, and Richard O’Kennedy
Introduction
Contaminant Monitoring
Traditional Means of Assessment
Instrumentation-Based Analysis
Biosensors
Biacore
Sensor Surfaces
Assay Configuration
Antibodies
Antibody Production Strategies
Optical Immunosensors for Quality Determination
Electrochemical Sensors
Alternative Biosensor Formats
Pathogens
Bacterial Pathogens
Fungal Pathogens
Toxins
Mycotoxins
Water and Marine Toxins
Legislation
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Websites of Interest
References
Abstract:Immunosensors permit the rapid and sensitive analysis
of a range of analytes. Here, we provide a critical assessment of how
such formats can be implemented, with emphasis on the detection
of bacterial and fungal pathogens, agricultural contaminants (e.g.
pesticides and herbicides) and toxins.
INTRODUCTION
The monitoring of quality of food destined for human consump-
tion is a key consideration for farmers, the food industry, leg-
islators and, most importantly, for consumers (Karlsson 2004).
Hence, it is an absolute necessity to ensure that any contaminants
that may have a deleterious effect on human health are moni-
tored qualitatively and quantitatively in a sensitive and reliable
manner. For example, herbicides and pesticides are extremely
effective at suppressing the growth of plant and insect popula-
tions on agricultural produce, such as tomatoes and strawberries.
However, the extensive use of such potentially toxic compounds
may compromise the quality of the product, and prolonged ex-
posure may manifest itself as chronic toxicity in human hosts
(Keay and McNeil 1998). Furthermore, bacterial strains such
asSalmonella typhimuriumandListeria monocytogenes,which
are causative agents of salmonellosis and listeriosis, respectively,
can act as opportunistic pathogens and cause death through the
ingestion of contaminated produce. Consequently, the develop-
ment of suitable methods for their rapid detection is an absolute
necessity. Finally, there is also an urgent need to accurately
monitor the distribution of toxins, including fungal (e.g. myco-
toxins) and water-borne toxins (e.g. phycotoxins), which cause
severe illness through the consumption of contaminated food
(e.g. nuts, shellfish meat). In summary, rapid, sensitive and ac-
curate methodologies are essential for the evaluation of product
quality and for satisfying legislative requirements.
CONTAMINANT MONITORING
Traditional Means of Assessment
There are several standard methods that are currently used to
monitor the quality of food. As an example, fruit and vegetable
produce may be inspected by monitoring the colour, gloss, firm-
ness, shape and size of the product, as well as noting the presence
or absence of visible defects. This visual inspection may be per-
formed alongside more invasive methods, including the analysis
of the soluble solid content of the product and determining the
acidity, and is particularly useful for produce such as apples,
pears and berries. The main advantage of such tests relates to
the fact that they may be carried out immediately post-harvest
Food Biochemistry and Food Processing, Second Edition. Edited by Benjamin K. Simpson, Leo M.L. Nollet, Fidel Toldr ́a, Soottawat Benjakul, Gopinadhan Paliyath and Y.H. Hui.
©C2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
858