POLITICS OF ARISTOTLE

(Wang) #1
I j2 ARISTOTLE'S POLZIZCS.




    1. rrjv 6; BaorXclav rivayraiov 4 roiJvopa pdvov t,yw O~X okav, 4 a,rf
      aoXhIjv hmpoxju cfvot rrjv 706 @aoiAr;ovros, ijmc rrju rupavvlSa ~cbp$nl~
      o&av nAeiurov ~H~XX'LV no'hrrdap, 6ck~pov 62 rrju 6htyapXiav (6 rhp
      dprmoKparLa BiiuvKcv ;si, 7a;qs soh3 rjs nohirda~).
      Royalty and tyranny both depend upon the individual vi11 of
      the king or tyrant: hence it is argued that if royalty is the best,
      tyranny must be the worst of governments, because one is the pre-
      eminence of good, the other of evil. Aristode, who is oyer-
      mastered by the idea of opposites, naturally infers that the very
      worst must be the opposite of the very best.
      We might expect atrjs, or r+ dpiurqs to be added;
      but hristotle substitutes the more general nohrrcia here, as &e-
      where, used in a good sense. Compare infra c. 8. $ 2, rfXfuTniou
      6i mpi mpavvi8os cV"x0ydv iurc roi{uauBat puciav 6th ri, ?rau&v +mra
      rairqv &at nohirdav, {piv 62 T~V p&whv &ai sfpi aohirrias : also for
      the general meaning, Plat. Polit. 301 D, Rep. ix. 576 D, etc.
      In the phrase ra;rqs rjs rroXrrfias the nord refers to dhryapxiau.
      fo'q p& ov'u lis d?irc#+aro Kal T&V HP~TEPOV ov"7os.
      The difference beheen Plato (Polit. 303) and Aristotle, n hich
      is dwelt upon so emphatically, is only verbal: the latter objecting
      to call that good in any sense, which may also be evil, a some-
      \?.-hat pedar.tic use of language, which is not uniformly maintained b:
      .bistotle himself. Cp. vi. 4. $ I, 8?p~pUTliV oioiv rsrrdpov peXduTq
      Ij aplrq Td&
      xai rtv~pdrcpov is a strange form of citation from Plato n.hich
      \vould seem more appropriate to a later generation than to Aristotle.
      See Essay on the Criticism of Plato in Xristotle.




aohtrcias.

2 3.


  1. 4-6. The programme corresponds fairly, but not very accurately,
    \r.ith the subjects nhich follow. At chap, 14, before discussifi;
    the causes of ruin and preservation in states, having analpsed in
    general outline the various types of oligarchy, democracy, poli:!,
    tyranny, Aristotle introduces a discussion respecting the powr~
    and offices which exist in a single state : but of this new beginnin,"
    which interrupts the sequence of his plan he says nothing here.

  2. I. The diversity of governments has been already discussed, but
    not in detail, in bk. iii. c. 6-8.

Free download pdf