614
Media Planning: How Leading Advertis-
ing Agencies Estimate Effective Reach
and Frequency” (Urbana: University of
Illinois, Department of Advertising, pa-
per no. 20, January 1985). Also see Jack
Z. Sissors and Lincoln Bumba, Advertising
Media Planning, 3d ed. (Lincolnwood, IL:
NTC Business Books, 1988), ch. 9.- Roland T. Rust and Richard W. Oliver,
“Notes and Comments: The Death of Ad-
vertising,” Journal of Advertising, De-
cember 1994, pp. 71–77. - Gene Accas, “Prime Prices Fall with
Shares,”Broadcasting & Cable,September
28, 1998, p. 36; “Hilfilger Hikes Ads to
New Level: First Designer to Go Super
Bowl Route,”Daily News Record28, no. 7
(January 16, 1998): 2. - See Roland T. Rust, Advertising Media Mod-
els: A Practical Guide(Lexington, MA: Lex-
ington Books, 1986). - See Jay W. Forrester, “Advertising: A Prob-
lem in Industrial Dynamics,”Harvard
Business Review, March–April 1959, pp.
100–10. - See Amber G. Rao and Peter B. Miller,
“Advertising/Sales Response Functions,”
Journal of Advertising Research, April 1975,
pp. 7–15. - See Alfred A. Kuehn, “How Advertising
Performance Depends on Other Market-
ing Factors,”Journal of Advertising Re-
search, March 1962, pp. 2–10. - See also Hani I. Mesak, “An Aggregate Ad-
vertising Pulsing Model with Wearout Ef-
fects,”Marketing Science, Summer 1992,
pp. 310–26; and Fred M. Feinberg, “Puls-
ing Policies for Aggregate Advertising
Models,” Marketing Science, Summer
1992, pp. 221–34. - Forrester, “Advertising,” p. 102.
- Russell I. Haley, James Staffaroni, and
Arthur Fox, “The Missing Measures of
Copy Testing,”Journal of Advertising Re-
search, May–June 1994, pp. 46–56. (Also
see this May–June 1994 issue of the Jour-
nal of Advertising Researchfor more arti-
cles on copy testing.) - See J. O. Peckham, The Wheel of Market-
ing (Scarsdale, NY: privately printed,
1975), pp. 73–77. - Kristian S. Palda, The Measurement of Cu-
mulative Advertising Effect(Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964), p. 87. - David B. Montgomery and Alvin J. Silk,
“Estimating Dynamic Effects of Market
Communications Expenditures,” Man-
agement Science, June 1972, pp. 485–501. - See Robert D. Buzzell, “E. I. Du Pont de
Nemours & Co.: Measurement of Effects
of Advertising,” in his Mathematical Mod-
els and Marketing Management(Boston:
Division of Research, Graduate School of
Business Administration, Harvard Uni-
versity, 1964), pp. 157–79.- See Glen L. Urban, “Allocating Ad Bud-
gets Geographically,”Journal of Advertis-
ing Research, December 1975, pp. 7–16. - See Nigel Hollis, “The Link Between TV
Ad Awareness and Sales: New Evidence
from Sales Response Modelling,”Journal
of the Market Research Society, January
1994, pp. 41–55. - In addition to the sources cited below,
see David Walker and Tony M. Dubit-
sky, “Why Liking Matters,”Journal of
Advertising Research, May–June 1994,
pp. 9–18; Abhilasha Mehta, “How Ad-
vertising Response Modeling (ARM)
Can Increase Ad Effectiveness,”Journal
of Advertising Research, May–June 1994,
pp. 62–74; Karin Holstius, “Sales Re-
sponse to Advertising,” International
Journal of Advertising9, no. 1, (1990):
38–56; John Deighton, Caroline Hen-
derson, and Scott Neslin, “The Effects
of Advertising on Brand Switching and
Repeat Purchasing,”Journal of Marketing
Research,February 1994, pp. 28–43; Anil
Kaul and Dick R. Wittink, “Empirical
Generalizations About the Impact of
Advertising on Price Sensitivity and
Price,”Marketing Science14, no. 3, pt. 1,
(1995): G151–60; and Ajay Kalra and
Ronald C. Goodstein, “The Impact of
Advertising Positioning Strategies on
Consumer Price Sensitivity,”Journal of
Marketing Research, May 1998, pp.
210–24. - Gerald J. Tellis, “Advertising Exposure,
Loyalty, and Brand Purchase: A Two-
Stage Model of Choice,”Journal of Mar-
keting Research, May 1988, pp. 134–44.
Also see “It’s Official: Some Ads Work,”
The Economist,April 1, 1995, p. 52;
Dwight R. Riskey, “How TV Advertising
Works: An Industry Response,”Journal
of Marketing Research,May 1997, pp.
292–93. - See Michael A. Kamins, Lawrence J.
Marks, and Deborah Skinner, “Televi-
sion Commercial Evaluation in the Con-
text of Program Induced Mood:
Congruency versus Consistency Ef-
fects,”Journal of Advertising, June 1991,
pp. 1–14. - See Kenneth R. Lord and Robert E.
Burnkrant, “Attention versus Distrac-
tion: The Interactive Effect of Program
Involvement and Attentional Devices
on Commercial Processing,”Journal of
Advertising, March 1993, pp. 47–60; Ken-
neth R. Lord, Myung-Soo Lee, and Paul
L. Sauer, “Program Context Antecedents
of Attitude Toward Radio Commercials,”
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sci-
ence, Winter 1994, pp. 3–15.