202 CHAPTER 6
Figure 6.1
and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can lower people’s cortisol levels in addition to
decreasing their depressive symptoms (Deuschle et al., 2003; Werstiuk et al., 1996).
The stress–diathesis model of depression receives support from several sources
(Nemeroff, 2008). For one, higher levels of cortisol are associated with decreases in
the size of the hippo campus, which thereby impairs the ability to form new memories
(of the sort that later can be voluntarily recalled)—which in turn may contribute to
the decreased cognitive abilities that characterize depression. And, in fact, researchers
have reported that parts of this brain structure are smaller in depressed people than
in those who are not depressed (Neumeister, Charney, & Drevets, 2005; Neumeister
et al., 2005), which suggests that stress affects the symptoms of depression in part by
altering levels of cortisol, which in turn impairs the functioning of the hippocampus.
In addition, the role of stress in setting the stage for depression receives sup-
port from studies of newborn rats that were separated from their mothers for
brief periods of time each day (Plotsky et al., 2005). In adulthood, these stressed
rats not only had more HPA axis activity and higher levels of corticotropin-releas-
ing factor (CRF) than their nonstressed counterparts, but they also had a greater
density of CRF receptors in certain brain areas. Consistent with these fi ndings,
Paxil, an antidepressant medication that targets serotonin, seems to decrease acti-
vation of the HPA axis in rats that have been deprived of their mother’s presence
(Plotsky, cited in Nemeroff, 1998). Moreover, when these rats are taken off Paxil,
the increased activation resumes.
However, the stress–diathesis model describes only part of the neurological
piece of depression. As noted earlier, dopamine also probably plays a role, and may
do so independently of effects of stress. In addition, there’s an intriguing twist to the
fi nding that HPA axis activity is related to depression: Whereas HPA axis activity
increases in typical depression, it decreases in atypical depression (Kasckow, Baker,
& Geracioti, 2001). This fi nding suggests that the two forms of depression may
arise in part from different neurological mechanisms.
Genetics
Twin studies show that when one twin of a monozygotic (identical) pair has MDD,
the other twin has a risk of also developing the disorder that is four times higher
than when the twins are dizygotic (fraternal; Bowman & Nurnberger, 1993; Kendler,
Karkowski, & Prescott, 1999). Because monozygotic twins basically share all of
their genes but dizygotic twins share only half of their genes, these results point to a
role for genetics in the etiology of this disorder. One possibility is that genes infl uence
how a person responds to stressful events (Costello et al., 2002; Kendler et al., 2005).
If a person is sensitive to stressful events, the sensitivity could lead to increased HPA
axis activation (Hasler et al., 2004), which in turn could contribute to depression.
6.1 • The HPA Axis Stress activates the hypothalamus, which releases
corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), which in turn stimulates the pituitary gland to
release adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which then instructs the adrenal glands
to release cortisol. According to the stress–diathesis model of depression, people who
become depressed have high levels of cortisol, which lead to heightened reactivity to
stress and increased serotonin levels.
g
Stressor
Pituitary activity:
Pituitary releases
adrenocortico-
tropic hormone
(ACTH).
Adrenal glands
release cortisol.
Hypothalamic
activity:
Hypothalamus
releases
corticotropin-
releasing factor
(CRF).