The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
Methods and History of Gender Research 65

between cross-sectional and longitudinal
studies; longitudinal designs may provide
stronger tests of causality and are able to
distinguish cohort effects from age effects.
We face a number of difficulties in the
scientific study of gender. The experimenter
can be a source of bias by influencing the
question asked, the way a study is designed
(including the participants chosen and the way
variables are manipulated and measured), the
way the data are collected, how the data are
interpreted, and whether the data are reported.
Participants also can influence the outcome of
a study, in particular by demand characteristics
and concerns with self-presentation. Other
difficulties that researchers encounter when
studying gender include the problem of
generalizing from the laboratory to the real
world, isolating the effects of participant’s sex
from variables that are confounded with sex
such as status and gender role, and considering
how the context influences behavior.
In the second half of the chapter,
I reviewed the history of the psychology of
gender. The field began by addressing the
question of whether women were intellectually
inferior to men. When there was insufficient
evidence to support this claim, the field shifted
to focus on the mental or psychological
differences between men and women, that
is, masculinity and femininity. The first

comprehensive measure of masculinity and
femininity was the AIAS, but numerous other
inventories soon followed. A major shift in
the conceptualization and measurement of
masculinity and femininity occurred in 1974
with the development of the BSRI and the
PAQ. These two instruments challenged the
bipolar assumption that masculinity and
femininity are opposites and the view that
the healthiest people are masculine men and
feminine women. Instead, the model of mental
health was embodied in the androgynous
person, someone who incorporates both
feminine and masculine traits.
The most recent approaches to
the conceptualization of femininity and
masculinity have emphasized their multiple
components. We now realize that femininity
and masculinity consist of behaviors,
roles, and physical characteristics as well
as personality traits. Researchers have also
emphasized how the social context influences
the display of sex differences and the
meaning of gender. An area of research that
emphasizes the role society plays in shaping
gender-role norms is gender-role strain.
Gender-role strain is experienced when the
norms for our gender role conflict with our
naturally occurring tendencies or with what
would be psychologically adaptive. This area
of research has largely been applied to men.


  1. Describe a scientific theory with
    which you are familiar. It does
    not have to be from psychology; it
    could be from biology or physics,
    for example. Go through the stages
    of the research process shown in
    Figure 2.1.

  2. What is the difference between
    random assignment and random


sampling? How is each related to
internal and external validity?


  1. Identify behaviors you think might
    be interpreted differently when dis-
    played by a female versus a male.
    For each one, explain why.

  2. If you have ever been in an ex-
    periment, discuss some of the
    ways that just knowing you were


Discussion Questions


M02_HELG0185_04_SE_C02.indd 65 6/21/11 12:20 PM

Free download pdf