[ 1949 ]
Orgonon
Rangeley , Maine
My dear Neill:
260
October 2 I, 1949
I received the number of the Journal of Sex Education * which
contains the slander, together with your reply. I wondered why you did
not say point blank that you are using an orgone accumulator for your
self and your family with some benefit.
Would you kindly try to find out the name, profession and back
ground of competence of this fellow who is, to all appearances, either
a pervert or a delegate of the C.P.
Summerhill School
Leiston, Suffolk
My dear Reich,
- • •
October 28, 1949
You ask why I didn't mention our own use of the Accu in my
reply to that interview. Simply because such a reply would cut no ice,
and would be attributed to blind faith. Whereas your doctors can give
definite seeable results ... tumours lessening or disappearing. But I
wouldn't have done so for myself [i.e., written a reply to the bad
review], for, as you know, we differ about fighting back, and I have
seldom if ever replied to a bad review of my books. I regret that you
do so much of this-to me-negative fighting; it takes you away from
genuine work, and the papers and journals have always the last word.
I've always ignored my enemies, and I don't think they ever did me any
real harm. But this will take up an evening in O[rgonon] next summer,
this argument. The J .H.H.'st are unbedeutend [insignificant]. Flies
annoy a cow but they don't seem to hamper her milk supply.
Sure, put me down for a talk on education next conference. I am
hoping that education will come more forward than it did last summer
and that the medical and scientific men will share the talks with the
self-reguln. guys.
Life goes on here as strenuously as usual. We sit in the Accu daily,
* Edited by Norman Haire.
t The author whose review had so angered Reich.