Applying Present Worth Techniques 153Alternative 1
Salvage TerminalValueat
Value End of 10thYeart t
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-141Initial Replacement
1!
Cost Cost II
I. 7-yearLife I 7-yearLife
IAlternative 2
Terminal Value at
End of 10th Year. t
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13
11'. Initial i
Cost II
13-year Life
lO-year Analysis Period
FIGURE 5.1 Superimposing a lO-year analysis period on 7- and 13-year alternatives.
A diesel manufacturer is considering the two alternative production machines graphically depicted
in Figure 5-1. Specific data are as follows.Initial cost
Estimated salvage value at end of useful life
Useful life of equipment, in yearsAlt. 1
$50,000
$10,000
7Alt. 2
$75,000
$12,000
13The manufacturer uses an interest rate of 8% and wants to use the PW method to compare these
alternatives over an analysis period of 10 yeats.Estimated market value, end of lO-year.analysis period
Alt. 1
$20;000Alt. 2
$15,000SOLUTIONIn this case, the decision maker is setting the analysis period at 10 years rather than acceptiug a
common multiple of the lives of the alternatives, or assuming that the period of needed service
is infinite (to be discussed in the next section). This is a legitimate approach-perhaps the diesel
manuf~cturer will be phasing out this model at the end of the 10-year period. In.any event, we~ n~cl t<)!fOffiRNyt,e a!emaJiyesOY,yI;tbe 1O~y.ear.period. ;;;; ~1iII ~
'II'il
I
I"I'll 1
,1',I 1
u- -----..
~=
--
-- - -- -- - ---
r