Engineering Economic Analysis

(Chris Devlin) #1
Applying Present Worth Techniques 153

Alternative 1
Salvage TerminalValueat
Value End of 10thYear

t t
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14

1

Initial Replacement
1

!
Cost Cost II
I. 7-yearLife I 7-yearLife
I

Alternative 2
Terminal Value at
End of 10th Year

. t
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13


1

1'

. Initial i
Cost II
13-year Life
lO-year Analysis Period
FIGURE 5.1 Superimposing a lO-year analysis period on 7- and 13-year alternatives.


A diesel manufacturer is considering the two alternative production machines graphically depicted
in Figure 5-1. Specific data are as follows.

Initial cost
Estimated salvage value at end of useful life
Useful life of equipment, in years

Alt. 1
$50,000
$10,000
7

Alt. 2
$75,000
$12,000
13

The manufacturer uses an interest rate of 8% and wants to use the PW method to compare these
alternatives over an analysis period of 10 yeats.

Estimated market value, end of lO-year.analysis period


Alt. 1
$20;000

Alt. 2
$15,000

SOLUTION

In this case, the decision maker is setting the analysis period at 10 years rather than acceptiug a
common multiple of the lives of the alternatives, or assuming that the period of needed service
is infinite (to be discussed in the next section). This is a legitimate approach-perhaps the diesel
manuf~cturer will be phasing out this model at the end of the 10-year period. In.any event, we

~ n~cl t<)!fOffiRNyt,e a!emaJiyesOY,yI;tbe 1O~y.ear.period. ;;;; ~1iII ~


'II'il
I
I"

I

'll 1
,1',I 1
u


  • -----..


~=


--


-- - -- -- - ---
r
Free download pdf