Model 2
Variable Coefficient
Empirical
Std Err
INTERCEPT 0.5625 0.4058
RX 0.3104 0.3992
SEQUENCE 0.7118 0.5060
Model 3
Variable Coefficient
Empirical
Std Err
INTERCEPT 0.2007 0.3178
RX 0.3008 0.3868
- State the logit form of the model for Model 1, Model 2,
and Model 3. - Use Model 1 to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confi-
dence intervals for RX (active vs. standard treatment).
Hint.Make use of the variance–covariance matrix for
the parameter estimates. - In Model 1, what is the difference between the working
covariance matrix and the covariance matrix for
parameter estimates used to obtain the 95% confidence
interval in the previous question? - Use Model 1 to perform the Wald test on the interaction
term RX*SEQ at a 0.05 level of significance. - Use Model 1 to perform the Score test on the interac-
tion term RX*SEQ at a 0.05 level of significance. - Estimate the odds ratio for RX using Model 2 and
Model 3. Is there a suggestion that SEQUENCE is con-
founding the association between RX and heartburn
relief. Answer this question from a data-based perspec-
tive (i.e., comparing the odds ratios) and a theoretical
perspective (i.e., what it means to be a confounder).
Test 563