The regression parameter estimates are very
similar for the two models. The odds ratio for
aspirin use on artery reocclusion is estimated
as exp(1.3302)¼0.264 using the GEE model
and exp(1.3253)¼0.266 using the ALR
model. The standard errors for the aspirin
parameter estimates are the same in both mod-
els (0.1444), although the standard errors for
some of the other parameters are slightly larger
in the ALR model.
The corresponding measure of association
(the odds ratio) estimate from the ALR model
can be found by exponentiating the coeffi-
cient of ALPHA1. This odds ratio estimate is
exp(0.4716)¼0.62. As with the estimated
exchangeable correlationð^rÞfrom the GEE
approach, the exchangeable OR estimate,
whichislessthan1,alsoindicatesanegative
association between any pair of outcomes
(i.e., reocclusions on the same bypass patient).
A 95% confidence interval for the OR can be
calculated as exp[0.4716 1.96(0.1217)],
which yields the confidence interval (0.49,
0.79). TheP-value for the Wald test is also given
in the output at 0.0001, indicating the statistical
significance of the ALPHA1 parameter.
For the GEE model output, an estimated stan-
dard error (SE) or statistical test is not given
for the correlation estimate. This is in contrast
to the ALR output, which provides a standard
error and statistical test for ALPHA1.
EXAMPLE (continued)
Odds ratios
dORASPIRIN¼1vs:ASPIRIN¼ 0 :
GEE!expð 1 : 3302 Þ¼ 0 : 264
ALR!expð 1 : 3253 Þ¼ 0 : 266
S.E. (Aspirin)¼0.1444 (GEE and
ALR)
Measure of associationðdORjkÞ
dORjk¼expðALPHA 1 Þ
¼expð 0 : 4716 Þ¼ 0 : 62
(Negative association:
similar to^r¼ 0 : 0954
95% CI for ALPHA1
¼exp½ð 0 : 4716 1 : 96 ð 0 : 1217 Þ
¼ð 0 : 49 ; 0 : 79 Þ
P-value¼0.0001
)ALPHA1 significant
GEE (r) ALR (ALPHA1)
SE? No Yes
Test? No Yes
574 16. Other Approaches for Analysis of Correlated Data