CLR approach )
responses assumed independent
Subject-specific gi allows for conditioning by
subject
fixed effect
Responses can be independent if
conditioned by subject
When using the CLR approach for modeling
P(X), the responses from a specific subject are
assumed to be independent. This may seem
surprising since throughout this chapter we
have viewed two or more responses on the
same subject as likely to be correlated. Never-
theless, when dummy variables are used for
each subject, each subject has his/her own
subject-specific fixed effect included in the
model. The addition of these subject-specific
fixed effects can account for correlation that
may exist between responses from the same
subject in a GEE model. In other words,
responses can be independent ifconditioned
by subject. However, this is not always the
case. For example, if the actual underlying
correlation structure is autoregressive, condi-
tioning by subject would not account for the
within-subject autocorrelation.
Returning to the Heartburn Relief Study data,
the output obtained from running the condi-
tional logistic regression is presented on the left.
With a conditional logistic regression, parame-
ter estimates are not obtained for the intercept
or the dummy variables representing the
matched factor (i.e., subject). These para-
meters cancel out in the expression for the
conditional likelihood. However, this is not a
problem because the parameter of interest is
the coefficient of the treatment variable (RX).
The odds ratio estimate for the effect of
treatment for relieving heartburn is exp
(0.4055)¼1.50, with a 95% confidence interval
of (0.534, 4.214).
EXAMPLE (continued)
Model 1:conditional logistic
regression
Variable Coefficient
Std.
error
Wald
P-value
RX 0.4055 0.5271 0.4417
Nob 0 orgiestimates in CLR model
(cancel out in conditional
likelihood)
Odds ratio and 95% CI
dOR¼expð 0 : 4055 Þ¼ 1 : 50
95 %CI¼ð 0 : 534 ; 4 : 214 Þ
576 16. Other Approaches for Analysis of Correlated Data