2.1.3.4 “Management By” – Type Approaches
The numerous “management by...” models also provide valuable insights into
how managers lead, though they do so from a different perspective: they do not
concentrate on the type or style of managers, but on what techniques and methods
are used. As there are already countless management concepts and the number is
still growing, I will only present the four most important variants. The others are
extensions of or variations on these four concepts:
Firstly, inmanagement by delegationdecision-making tasks, responsibilities and
authority are delegated as much as possible throughout the hierarchy. The respon-
sibility of the manager is limited to providing supervision. This management
principle developed naturally from the progressive division of labor in modern
society. In Germany this has been propagated since 1962, when Reinhard H€ohn
developed the Harzburger Model. H€ohn, a professor of State and Administrative
Law at the Universities of Heidelberg and Berlin, as well as founder of the
Akademie fur F€ €uhrungskr€afte der Wirtschaft(“Academy for Corporate Managers”)
in Bad Harzburg (1956), defined the German understanding of leadership in
management in Germany with this model, primarily in the 1960s, but also through-
out the 1970s and until the mid 1980s. This model provides companies with
effective methods for organizing and monitoring bureaucratic processes by means
of establishing operational sequences in day-to-day business. The Harzburger
Model provides accurate knowledge for managers on how to lead by delegating
authoritarian authoritative affiliative democratic achievement-
oriented
coaching
modus operandi
of the leadership
style
expects orders
to be carried out
immediately
stimulates people
to realize a vision
creating a sense
of harmony and
emotional ties
reaching
consensus
through
participatory
measures
high standards of
achievement
prepares
colleagues for
the future: "Give it a
try!"
brief
characterization
of the style
"Do what I tell
you!"
"Come along
with me!"
"It's the people
that count."
"What do you
think of this?"
"Do things the
way I do them –
right away!"
encouragement
of others,
empathy, self-
critical attitude
underlying skills
related to
emotional
intelligence
zest for action,
drive, self-control
self-confidence,
empathy,
catalyst for
change
empathy, ability
to create positive
relationships and
to communicate
well
cooperation,
being in charge
of teams,
communicative
skills
dilligence,
success-
orientation,
energy
to support a
colleague,
advance his
performance or
develop long-
term strengths
in what situations
does this style
work best
during a crisis in
order to effect a
turnaround or
with problematic
co-workers
in cases where
change
necessitates a
new vision or
when a clear
direction is
needed
reestablishing
rapport within a
team and
motivating people
under stress
to obtain
commitment and
consensus and
procure
contributions
from valuable
colleagues
whenever a
highly motivated,
efficient team has
to come up with
quick results
general effect on
the atmosphere
negative clearest, positive positive positive negative positive
Fig. 2.3 Overview of the six leadership styles (Source: Goleman 2000)
52 2 Occupation or Calling: What Makes for Good Leadership?