200 THEARCHITECTURE
OF
HUMANISM
they sacrificedthe unaffectedmerits of the oldnational architecture, were amere travestyof theforeign. Thespirit offashion,as iscommonly the
case, seized onthe detail and failedto grasp theprinciple. Ignorant builders,with German
patternbooks in hand, were little likely tofurnish space,proportionand dignity. But capitalsand friezeswere theauthenticmode ofRome. Thus, with
anardent prodigality, littlepilasters ofallshapesandsizes were lavished, wherever they couldfind
afooting, upon Jacobeanmansionsand the chateauxof Touraine. But the printedpages of Serlio andPalladio, when they came, wereapledge ofortho-doxy.The academic influence rescued the archi-tectureofEnglandandFrance. Itprovided
acanonofformsbywhicheventheuninspiredarchitectcouldsecureatleastameasureofdistinction
;andgenius,where it existed, could be trusted to use thisscholastic learning as a means and not
an end.Wren, Vanbrugh,and Adam in England, and the
whole eighteenth-century architecture of France,areevidenceofthefact.ThevalueofVitruvius
wasrelativetoatimeandplace. After
three hundred years of exaggerated
gloryandhonestusefulnesshebecamea
bywordfor
stupidity. Pope satirised him
; archaeologists dis-
coveredthatthe Roman
buildingscorresponded
butimperfectly
to
his
laws; the Greek