200 THEARCHITECTURE
OF
HUMANISM
they sacrificed
the unaffected
merits of the old
national architecture, were a
mere travesty
of the
foreign. Thespirit offashion,
as iscommonly the
case, seized on
the detail and failed
to grasp the
principle. Ignorant builders,
with German
pattern
books in hand, were little likely to
furnish space,
proportion
and dignity. But capitals
and friezes
were theauthentic
mode ofRome. Thus, with
an
ardent prodigality, little
pilasters ofallshapesand
sizes were lavished, wherever they could
find
a
footing, upon Jacobean
mansionsand the chateaux
of Touraine. But the printed
pages of Serlio and
Palladio, when they came, wereapledge ofortho-
doxy.
The academic influence rescued the archi-
tectureofEnglandandFrance. It
provided
a
canon
offormsbywhicheventheuninspiredarchitectcould
secureatleastameasureofdistinction
;
andgenius,
where it existed, could be trusted to use this
scholastic learning as a means and not
an end.
Wren, Vanbrugh,and Adam in England, and the
whole eighteenth-century architecture of France,
areevidenceofthefact.
ThevalueofVitruvius
wasrelativetoatimeand
place. After
three hundred years of exaggerated
gloryandhonestusefulnesshebecamea
bywordfor
stupidity. Pope satirised him
; archaeologists dis-
coveredthatthe Roman
buildingscorresponded
but
imperfectly
to
his
laws; the Greek