2
1
111
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with recycling according
to the number of cases
>150
%
<‐ 150
%
>150%
<‐150%
recycling
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
recycling
Water consumption
Incineration
with energy
recovery
Landfill Pyrolysis
Figure 19 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. recycling for water consumption for plastics. The size
of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
1
1
1
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases
>150%
<‐ 1
50
%
<‐150%
incineration with
energy recovery
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
incineration with
energy recovery
Recycling Landfill Pyrolysis
Water consumption
Figure 20 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration for water consumption for plastics. The
size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.