References 393Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the
form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3,77–104.
Holland, P. C. (1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated con-
ditioned food aversions. Learning and Motivation, 12,1–18.
Holland, P. C. (1983a). Occasion setting in Pavlovian feature posi-
tive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, &
A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior:
Discrimination processes (pp. 183–206). Cambridge, MA:
Ballinger.
Holland, P. C. (1983b). Representation-mediated overshadowing
and potentiation of conditioned aversions. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 1–13.
Holland, P. C. (1989). Feature extinction enhances transfer of occa-
sion setting. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17,269–279.
Holland, P. C., & Forbes, D. T. (1982). Representation-mediated
extinction of conditioned flavor aversions. Learning and Motiva-
tion, 13,454–471.
Holland, P. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1975). The effect of two ways of
devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-
order appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Animal Behavior Processes, 1,355–363.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to
behavior theory.New York: Appleton-Century.
Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system: An introduction to behavior
theory concerning the individual organism.New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Hursh, S. R., & Natelson, B. H. (1981). Electrical brain stimulation
and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity. Physi-
ology & Behavior, 26,509–515.
Jenkins, H. M., & Moore, B. R. (1973). The form of the autoshaped
response with food or water reinforcers. Journal of the Experi-
mental Analysis of Behavior, 20,163–181.
Jones, J. R., & Moore, J. (1999). Some effects of intertrial-duration
on discrete-trial choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of
Behavior, 71,375–393.
Kacelnik, A., & Bateson, M. (1996). Risky theories—the effects
of variance on foraging decisions. American Zoologist, 36,
402–434.
Kamil, A. C. (1983). Optimal foraging theory and the psychology of
learning.American Zoologist, 23,291–302.
Kamil, A. C., & Clements, K. C. (1990). Learning, memory, and for-
aging behavior. In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.),Contemporary issues in
comparative psychology(pp. 7–30). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Kamin, L. J. (1965). Temporal and intensity characteristics of the
conditioned stimulus. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical condi-
tioning(pp. 118–147). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kamin, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes in classical condi-
tioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Pre-
diction of Behavior: Aversive stimulation(pp. 9–33). Miami, FL:
University of Miami Press.
Kasprow, W. J., Cacheiro, H., Balaz, M. A., & Miller, R. R. (1982).
Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed
stimulus.Learning and Motivation, 13,155–166.
Kaufman, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect
of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18,
318–320.
Kehoe, E. J., & Gormezano, I. (1980). Configuration and combina-
tion laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. Psychological
Bulletin, 87,351–378.
Kehoe, E. J., Horne, A. J., Horne, P. S., & Macrae, M. (1994).
Summation and configuration between and within sensory
modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit. Animal Learn-
ing & Behavior, 22,19–26.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In
D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation(Vol. 15,
pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Killeen, P. (1968). On the measurement of reinforcement frequency
in the study of preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis
of Behavior, 11,263–269.
Killeen, P. (1994). Mathematical principles of reinforcement.Behav-
ioral and Brain Sciences, 17,105–172 (includes commentary).
Kimble, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis’ “Condition and Learn-
ing.”New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against nor-
mative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 126,54–70.
Kirby, K. N., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference reversals due to
myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science,
6,83–89.
Köhler, W. (1947).Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new con-
cepts in modern psychology.New York: Liveright Publication Co.
Kollins, S. H., Newland, M. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (1997). Human
sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do
consequences matter? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4,
208–220.
Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisci-
plinary approach.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kraemer, P. J., Lariviere, N. A., & Spear, N. E. (1988). Expression
of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound:
Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases
over a retention interval in adults. Animal Learning & Behavior,
16,164–168.
Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., & Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release
from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning &
Behavior, 19,139–145.
Logue, A. W. (1979). Taste aversion and the generality of the laws
of learning. Psychological Bulletin, 86,276–296.
Logue, A. W., Rodriguez, M. L., Pena-Correal, T. E., & Mauro,
B. C. (1984). Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification