References 593the extent to which they impact other variables in the learning
situation. In addition, we have a lot to learn about the indi-
vidual variables that are difficult to quantify (e.g., motivation,
persistence, interest) but undoubtedly are critical in a full
model of comprehension. The current and future challenge
for research in comprehension is to continue to uncover vari-
ables in input and individual factors that influence and sup-
port learning and to integrate such knowledge into the
already complex picture of what makes a good learner.
REFERENCES
Adams, B. C., Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A trading rela-
tionship between reading skill and domain knowledge in chil-
dren’s text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20,307–323.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role
of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of lin-
ear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64,
201–252.
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unre-
callable material following a shift in perspective. Journal of
Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning, 17,1–12.
Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning
and retention of meaningful verbal material.Journal of Educa-
tional Psychology, 51,267–272.
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working Memory.New York: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes.Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A.
(1991). Revising social studies texts from a text-processing
perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading
Research Quarterly, 27,251–276.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence
memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive
Psychology, 3,193–209.
Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational
model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing infer-
ence calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educa-
tional Psychology, 83,329–345.
Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., Spurlin, J. E., & Holley, C. D.
(1983). Effects of headings on text processing. Journal of Edu-
cational Psychology, 75,292–302.
Butcher, K. R., & Kintsch, W. (2001). Support of content and rhetor-
ical processes of writing: Effects on the writing process and the
written product. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 277–322.
Cain, K. (1999). Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strate-
gies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 17,293–312.
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working
memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity:
Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal
of Memory and Language, 33,175–202.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax.Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in
acquisition.Cognition, 64,1–37.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Clark, H. H. (2000). Conversation. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclo-
pedia of psychology(pp. 292–294). New York: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. R. (1989). Contributing to discourse.
Cognitive Science, 13,259–294.
Corkill, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall.
Educational Psychology Review, 4,33–67.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in
working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 19,450–466.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in
integrating information between and within sentences. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
9,561–584.
DeJong, G. F. (1979). Prediction and substantiation: A new approach
to natural language processing.Cognitive Science, 3,251–272.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith,
A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A
connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a
memory skill. Science, 208,1181–1182.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.
Psychological Review, 102,211–245.
Ericsson, K. A., & Polson, P. (1988). An experimental analysis of
the mechanisms of a memory skill. Memory and Cognition, 14,
305–316.
Fellbaum, C. (Ed.). (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical data-
base.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferstl, E., & Kintsch, W. (1999). Learning from text: Structural
knowledge assessment in the study of discourse comprehension.
In H. V. Ostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of
mental representations during reading(pp. 247–278). Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measure-
ment of textual coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis.
Discourse Processes, 25,285–308.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles for visu-
ospatial and verbal working memory in situation model
construction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
129,61–83.