594 Text Comprehension and Discourse Processing
Goldman, S. R., & Varma, S. (1995). CAPing the construction-
integration model of discourse comprehension. In C. A.
Weaver III, S. M. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse
comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch(pp. 337–
358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse
comprehension.Annual Review of Psychology, 48,163–189.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing
inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological
Review, 101,371–395.
Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Processing components of
college-level reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17,
83–104.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English.
London: Longman.
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new
information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal
Behavior and Verbal Learning, 13,512–521.
Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. (1987). References in conversation be-
tween experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 116,26–37.
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10,409–
416.
Jenkins, J. J. (1974). Remember that old theory of memory? Well,
forget it! American Psychologist, 29,785–795.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language process-
ing.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading
and language comprehension.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of compre-
hension: Individual differences in working memory. Psycholog-
ical Review, 99,122–149.
Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., Matthews, C., Lamb, R., & the
LSA Research Group. (2000). Developing summarization skills
through the use of LSA-backed feedback. Interactive Learning
Environments, 8,87–109.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing:
A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95,
163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text pro-
cessing: Inferences. Discourse Processes, 16,193–202.
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning.
American Psychologist, 49,294–303.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational
theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7,257–266.
Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication.Cognitive Science, 25,173–202.
Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-
term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42,
186–198.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text com-
prehension and production. Psychological Review, 85,363–394.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sen-
tence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and
Language, 29,133–159.
Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (1999). Prevalence
and persistence of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and
Language, 40,593–604.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns.Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press.
Laham, R. D. (2000). Automated content assessment of text using
Latent Semantic Analysis to simulate human cognition.Unpub-
lished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Colorado.
Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning:
Latent Semantic Analysis theory. Current Directions in Psycho-
logical Science, 7,161–164.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s prob-
lem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induc-
tion and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review,
104,211–240.
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction
to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25,259–284.
Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2000). The Intelligent
Essay Assessor. IEEE Intelligent Systems,27–31.
Lenat, D., & Guha, R. (1990). Building large knowledge-based sys-
tems.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1985). Topic structure representation
and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,137–148.
Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1995). Effects of organizational signals
on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychol-
ogy, 87,537–544.
Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects of signal-
ing topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psy-
chology, 85,281–290.
Lyons, J. (1977).Semantics.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., Finstad, K., & Bourg, T. (2000).
The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 92,492–502.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading.
Psychological Review, 99,440–466.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996).
Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background
knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text.
Cognition and Instruction, 14,1–43.
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect
of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22,
247–288.