Homology and Homoplasy 453[Wagner, 2000] P. J. Wagner. Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa.
Evolution, 54: 365–386, 2000.
[Wake, 1991] D. B. Wake. Homoplasy: The result of natural selection or evidence of design
limitations?Amer. Natl., 138: 543–569, 1991.
[Wake, 1994] D. B. Wake. Comparative similarity.Science, 265: 268–269, 1994.
[Wake, 1996] D. B. Wake. Introduction. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.),Homoplasy:
The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution, pages xvii-xxv. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.,
1996.
[Wake, 1999] D. B. Wake. Homoplasy, homology and the problem of ‘sameness’ in biology. In G.
R. Bock and G. Cardew (ed.),Homology. Novartis Foundation Symposium 222, pages 24–33.
Wiley, Chichester, 1999.
[Wake and Larson, 1987]D. B. Wake and A. Larson. Multidimensional analysis of an evolving
lineage.Science, 238: 42–48, 1987.
[Wake, 1996] M. H. Wake. The use of unconventional morphological characters in the analysis
of systematic patterns and evolutionary processes. In L. Grande and O. Rieppel (eds.),Inter-
preting the Hierarchy of Nature: From Systematic Patterns to Evolutionary Process Theories,
pages 173–200. Academic Press, San Diego, 1996.
[Wake, 2001] M. H. Wake. Bodies and body plans, and how they came to be. In W. J. Kress
and G. W. Barrett (eds.),A New Century of Biology, pages 28–52. Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington and London, 2001.
[Wake and Summers, 2003]M. H. Wake and A. P. Summers. Morphology. In B. K. Hall and
W. M. Olson (eds.)Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, pages
268–275. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA., 2003.
[Weiss, 1994/1995]K. M. Weiss. What recapitulates what? Genetics and the evolution of de-
velopment.Evol. Anthropol., 3: 216–222, 1994/1995.
[Weiss and Buchanan, 2004]K. M. Weiss and A. V. Buchanan.Genetics and the Logic of Evo-
lution. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ., 2004.
[Wilkins, 2002] A. S. Wilkins.The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland, MA., 2002.
[Willey, 1911] A. Willey.Convergence in Evolution. John Murray, London, 1911.
[Wyss, 1988]A. R. Wyss. On “retrogression” in the evolution of the Phocinae and phylogenetic
affinities of the Monk seals.Amer. Mus. Novit., 2924: 1–38, 1988.
[Yablokov, 1974]A. V. Yablokov.Variability of Mammals. Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi,
1974.
[Young, 1993]B. A. Young. On the necessity of an Archetypal concept in morphology: With
special reference to the concepts of “Structure” and “Homology”.Biol. & Philos., 8: 225–248,
1993.