-^
No regulatory approval is required.
-^
Optimism reigns, advertisi
ng copy often implies 100%
effectiveness for everyone.
-^
Advertising copy neglects to mention drawbacks or difficulties.
-^
Advertising copy neglects to mention other alternatives. For more on this subject see
Product Promotion
on page
142
.
FDA Approval
Lack of approval means research results have not been evaluated
by the FDA, and that there has been no testing for safety or effectiveness by FDA.
Even if worthless, effectiveness is only relevant for drugs, not
food products. Product must be pr
oved unsafe to be removed from
market.
Doses may vary and there may be a lack of quality control. For
example, studies have shown that
even though the product labeling is
the same, ginseng content in supplements may vary by factor of 10, from same manufacturer.
Quackery Flags Examples
The following advertisements demonstrate how FANSA’s
warnings might be heeded.
The author, in highlighting these products, does not imply that
the product is or is not effective.
The first example,
Figure 15
, is for a Chinese diet tea. It is so
outrageous that few athletes are likely to accept the advertisement at face value.
Red flags for the Chinese tea product include:
-^
Claim that sounds too good to be true: Losing more than six pounds per week.
-^
Promise of a quick fix.
-^
Secret ingredients.
-^
Use of key words: for example, “natural.”
-^
No independent review.
-^
Wants money.
Figure 15. Nutritional quackery flags are described in the text.
The second and third examples,
Figure 16
and
Figure 17
, are
more believable, in part, because
of familiarity, because athletes and
coaches have embraced these products. An endorsement, however, means only that the athlete or coach
was paid for their statement.
Nutrition for Sports, Essentials of 140