Appendix 3.03 Survey of The Neurosciences
and Music III Conference 2008
Disorders and Plasticity
Part III. Music Training and Induced Cortical Plasticity
(16-30)Title, CategoryAimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion16.Trainor et al.
(133-142)
Musictraining and oscillatoryactivity
Cat. 10: Training- Pantev et al.
(143-150)Multimodal integration and plasticity in musical training
Cat. 10: Training
*18. Tervaniemi(151-156)Musicians- same or
different?
Cat. 8: Musicians
Cat. 10: Training*19. Wong et al.(157-163)Asymmetric cultural experiences and the auditory pathway Cat. 7: Culture Cat. 10: TrainingTo investigate the effects of musical training on gammaband activity To investigate the impact of short-term uni-andmulti-modal musical training
on auditory-somatosensoryintegration and plasticity
To review the evidence available about various neurocognitive profiles of musicians playing different instrumentsand genresTo discuss the impact of short-and long-termasymmetric musical
experiences on how the nervous system responds to complex soundsSix synthesized 500 msectones: violin, piano, and sinus
tones at pitches of 220 and
141 Hz
CR: NeutralFor MEG: Piano tones: a)3-tone standard sequence: G major broken chord. Deviant: last tone a minor third lower.
b)6-tone standard sequence:
Melody in C major. Deviant:last tone aminor third lowerCR: Western
a) instrumental sounds compared to sinus tones
b) Instrumental and sinus tones: chords in tuneand mistuned. c) sounds originating from one of six loudspeakers
CR: Western
a) Spoken sounds from tonelanguages.
Recorded music:b) Excerptsfrom Bach partitas. c) 30-sec excerpts ofWesternand Indian compositions for recognition task.10-18 secWestern and Indianmelodiesfor tension judgment task
CR: Western, IndianEEG during passive listening while tones were delivered in random order.11 professionalviolinists, 9 amateur pianists, 14 non-musicians.12children, 4 1/2 years, half of them beginnning Suzuki piano lessons. Retestafter 1year23 nonmusicians randomly assigned to a sensorimotorauditory group (SA) or an auditory group (A). SA learned to play a training sequence on the piano. A actively listened to the same sequence
Review ofstudies.a) MEG: N1m response in musicians and nonmusicians
b)Mismatch Negativity(MMN) responsein musiciansand nonmusicians.
c)EEG: P3a response
a-b)Review of studies on the
effects of musical training.c) Recognition and tension judgment tasks:3 groups:1) Monomusical Western.
2) Monomusical Indian.
3) Bimusical Western and IndianInduced gamma-band response has been associated with attention, expectation, memory retrieval, and integration of top-down,bottom-up, and multisensoryprocesses.
Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) measurements of musically induced mismatch negativity (MMN) before and aftertraining
a & b) Difference in response to sinus tones and to tones in the timbre of a musician’s own instrument.
c) in conductors: accuracytoprocess spatial sound information
a)Brainstem processing:
Frequency-followingresponse (FFR).b) corticalprocessing.c) Whether”bimusicality” can arise in response to exposure tomusic from two cultures, even without experience playing an instrument. Differences
between1-2) and 3)Evoked gamma-bandresponse is stronger for musical tones than for sinus tones in both musicians and nonmusicians.
Clear effect of musical training on gamma-bandresponses to musical tones.
SA showed significant enlargement of MMN aftertraining compared to A, reflecting greater enhancementof musical representations in auditory cortex
a) Musicians had an enhancedresponse to thetimbre of their own instrument.b& c)attentional neural processes can be modifiedby the type ofmusical expertise
a) Musicians exhibit enhanced encoding of linguistic pitch in the brain stem.c)People can acquiresensitivities to musicassociated with multiple cultures simply through exposure and enculturation. Listening to music is enough