Appendix 3.03 Survey of The Neurosciences
and Music III Conference 2008
Disorders and Plasticity
Title, Category
AimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion20S. Corrigal & Trainor
(164
-168)
Musical training and perception of key and harmony Cat. 10: Training
21S. Duke et al.
(169-172)Procedural memory
consolidation
Cat. 10: Training
Cat. 14: Memory
22S. Herholtz et al.
(173
-177)
Imagery mismatch negativity in musicians
Cat. 8: Musicians
23S. Huotilainen et al.
(178
-181)
Automatic memory functionsin children
Cat. 9: Child development
Cat. 14: MemoryTo investigate whether musical training acceleratesthe development of key membership and harmony perception in younger children
To test the extent to which overnight procedural memory consolidation is affected byextended rest breaks during training
To investigate musical imagery in musicians and nonmusicians
To record brain responses in order to assess the automatic perception and memoryrelated brain processes in 2year old childrenA familiar song, e.g. ”Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” presented in piano timbre
CR: Western
Task material:
1) 5-element finger-tappingsequence 2) 13-notekeyboard melody
CR: Western
Nine well-known songscomposed of sinustonesCR: Western
1)Modified Multi-feature paradigm (MFP): A simple repeated tone, including changes in pitch, loudness, duration, sound-sourcelocation, and temporal structure of sound. 2)RovingMelody Paradigm (RMP):3-secmusical pieces repeated,with low-level andhigh-levelchanges. CR: Western
40 children: 19 nonmusicians, 21 beginning music lessons.
Task: After initial training, to judge 10 test trials: 6 in standard form, 2 with out-ofkey change and 2 with out-ofharmony change on the last chord
1) 36 nonmusicians 2) 48non-pianist musicians. Task:
12 30-sec practice blocks.1/3 took rest break after 3 blocks, 1/3 after 9 blocks, 1/3 no breaksMEG: 15 musicians, 14 nonmusicians. Task: After 6 tones of melody, continue the melody in your mind, and judgeif a further presentedtone is a correct continuation
EEG: five scalp electrodes.
2-year old children partici-pating in musical play school
1) n = 14. 2) n=30Comparison of the first test with a similar test 8-12months later, when the second group hadreceivedmusic lessons
Retest next day: Comparison of gains in performance due to early rest breaks, late rest breaks, or no rest breaks
Imagery mismatch negativity (iMMN) elicited by incorrect tones
Mismatch negativity (MMN) elicited by changesFormal music training influences key and harmony perception in 3- to 6
-year-olds, and even nonmusicians as young as 3 years have some knowledge of key membership and harmony
Extended intervals of rest early in training lead to largest gain in performanceafter overnight sleep
Incorrect tones elicited an iMMN in musicians, but not in nonmusicians.
MMN is not limited to acoustic sensory input Clear indicators of changedetection to all change types. However, several individual children did not show MMN to a specific change type.
Both modified MFP and RMP are suitable for studying brain processes in 2-year oldchildren