The Economist - USA (2022-02-26)

(Maropa) #1

12 Special report Private markets TheEconomistFebruary26th 2022


 A list of acknowledgments and sources is included in the online version
of this special report
   Reprints of this special report are available, with a minimum order
of five copies. For academic institutions the minimum order is  and for companies .
We also offer a customisation service. To order, contact Foster Printing Service:
Tel: +   ; email: [email protected]
For information on reusing the articles featured in this special report, or for copyright queries,
contact The Economist Rights and Syndication Department: Tel: + ()  ;
email: [email protected]
   Previous special reports can be found at
Economist.com/specialreports

effectiveresourceallocation.A studyin 2020 lookedatwhathap­
penstopubliccompanieswhenpeinvestsintheirindustry:it
forcesrivalstorespondbybecomingmoreproductive.
Onjobs,a studyin 2019 ofpe­backedfirmsinAmericafound
thatemploymentdeclinedinexistingplantsby4%relativetooth­
ersinthesameindustry. Butinnewoperations,startedfrom
scratchoracquired,itincreasedby2.3%.Anotherstudyin 2021 of
9,800Americanbuy­outsbetween 1980 and 2013 concludedthat
employmentshrinks13%overtwoyearsafterbuy­outsofpublicly
listedfirms,relativetocontrolfirms,butgrowsby13%afterbuy­
outsofprivatelyheldfirms.Italsofoundpost­buy­outproductiv­
itygainsattargetfirmstobe“largeonaverageandmuchlargeryet
fordealsexecutedamidsttightcreditconditions”.
Criticstalkuppe’scostsandignoreitsbenefits.Whenciting
thestudyof9,800buy­outs,MsWarren’sofficefocusedonthe
jobslostatbought­outpublicfirms,notthoseaddedatprivate
ones.Butpeboostersplaydownallinstancesofrapaciousness,
employingthe“nobusinessiswithouttheoddbadapple”de­
fence.Tougherregulationlooms,inanyevent.n

Thethirdage

Barbarians at a crossroads


S


uperreturn,a davosforpe, helditsannualbash in Berlin last
November. One session on “Winners and Losers” went well, re­
calls Alex Koriath of Cambridge Associates, though “there weren’t
really any losers to talk about.” A self­congratulatory air permeat­
ed the event. Nile Rodgers and his band, Chic, entertained buy­out
bigwigs with their hit “Good Times”. 
Top­of­the­market  stuff?  Few  would  call  the  party’s  end.  This
year is unlikely to be as sweet as 2021, yet it may still be a record
year for private markets. Unlike last year, fund sponsors are likely
to look to raise more than investors are comfortable with, says Mr
Green  at  Lazard.  Some  may  end  up  short  of  their  targets,  rather
than blowing through them again.
Big risks include inflation and interest rates. Inflation is a cu­
rate’s  egg  for  pe;  firms  with  pricing  power  do  better  than  those
without. Higher rates can wreak havoc among leveraged buy­outs,
but also reflect higher growth. A rise of more than two or three per­
centage points could trigger defaults and bail­outs. On top of dear­
er  debt,  business  faces  wage  pressures,  supply­chain  problems
and  more  covid­19  uncertainty.  And  private  funds  must  contend
with more competition as public­market funds push into private
markets to meet demand for higher yields.  
In  less  benign  financial  conditions,  some  pension  funds,  in­
surers and family offices that came late to private markets may re­
assess their tolerance of illiquidity. A tech slump, to which peis
more exposed than it was, would also test investors’ loyalty.
Given how heady price tags are in buy­outs, “no one is banking
on selling at higher multiples than today,” says one dealmaker. “It
will be all about growing underlying profits enough to make a nice
return  on  the  same  or  a  lower  multiple.”  The  giants  of  petalk  of
picking “themes”: energy transition, health­care technology, take
your pick. Choose the right one, and the right firms, and you can
do well regardless of today’s valuations, they say. Amazon is not
the only success story once viewed from the rubble of the dotcom
bust as having been wildly overpriced.

David Swensen might disagree. At his last investment­commit­
tee meeting at Yale, he was “very bearish” on pevaluations, says
someone who was present. The ex­colleague also recalls Swensen
admitting  “the  possibility  that  everything  he  had  learned  was
wrong  and  we  were  now  in  a  different  world  where  valuations
could stay higher for longer.” But it didn’t sound like he believed it.
Swensen thought the best private funds could thrive in periods
of  economic  disruption,  riding  the  cycle  by  acquiring  under­
valued or distressed assets. But the idea that private markets are
greedy when others are fearful, and can profit accordingly, may be
wrong.  Last  year  Sirio  Aramonte  and  Fernando  Avalos  of  the  bis
studied risk­taking in private markets and concluded that they are
as procyclical as public markets. They found capital deployment
in both peand debt to be “positively correlated with stockmarket
returns, ie, more transactions are completed in bullish times.” 
Whatever  the  short­term  outlook  for  private  markets,  they
have  become  a  large  and  permanent  feature  of  global  finance.
They  have  expanded  and  matured  during  the  past  decade’s  hunt
for yield. Products have become more sophisticated. A secondary
market has blossomed. All this has made more investors, includ­
ing retail investors, comfortable with them. 
With  private  markets  representing  less  than  a  tenth  of  global
investable assets, there is plenty of room for growth. Some parts of
the world, particularly Asia, look underserved. China’s crackdown
on private enterprise has led some pefirms to cut back there. But
the  region  as  a  whole,  long  heavily  reliant  on  bank  finance,  is  a
market waiting to be tapped. Private funds are licking their lips at
the prospect of more corporate carve­outs from Asian conglomer­
ates, like those seen at Hitachi and Panasonic. Europe, also largely
reliant  on  banks  and  home  to  thousands  of  family­owned  firms
approaching  generational  transfer,  is  fertile  ground  as  well.  Bar­
ring  an  interest­rate  shock,  “we’re  not  even  close  to  starting  the
shift  towards  more  [private­markets]  activity,”  reckons  Bruce
Flatt, boss of Brookfield Asset Management.
More  competition  will  narrow  outperformance  over  public
markets.  For  the  biggest  firms,  lower  returns  come  partly  by  de­
sign: they are becoming diversified asset managers, geared to stea­
dy management­fee income, with greater scale compensating for
lower returns. The industry’s metabolism is slowing as it seeks to
add longer­term capital that allows assets to be held for longer pe­
riods.  Such  capital  already  makes  up  almost  a  quarter  of  Black­
stone’s assets.
Making this pivot work is the biggest challenge for a new gen­
eration  of  buy­out  bosses.  Success  implies  asset­gathering  on  a
much larger scale, as Blackstone and other big firms try to get clos­
er  in  size  and  substance  to  BlackRock,  the  giant  of  global  asset
management. That will alarm those who see peas capitalism red
in tooth and claw. But private markets are emerging as a viable al­
ternative—or stepping stone—to public ownership.The more so­
phisticated they grow, the greater the choice forfirms and inves­
tors alike. And that has to be good for capitalism.n

The future may well be bright. It will certainly
be less high-octane
Free download pdf