Essays in Anarchism and Religion

(Frankie) #1

276 Essays in Anarchism and Religion: Volume 1



  1. Woodcock, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, p. 99.

  2. PM, p. 452.

  3. PM, p. 461. Humanity must instead recognise God, not as man’s
    reflection, but as “his antagonist. And this last consideration will suf-
    fice to make us reject humanism also, as tending invincibly, by the
    deification of humanity, to a religious restoration. The true remedy
    for fanaticism [...] is to prove to humanity that God, in case there is
    a God, is its enemy” (PM, pp. 467–8).

  4. De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans L’Eglise, volume ii,
    p. 253. Cited in de Lubac, The Un-marxian Socialist, p. 289.

  5. This is not equivalent to a denial of the existence of God (which
    would be to lapse into the discourse of theism and atheism). Rather,
    “A prejudice relative to the divine essence has been destroyed [e.g.
    Providence]; by the same stroke the independence of man is estab-
    lished: that is all. The reality of the divine Being is left intact, and our
    hypothesis still exists” (PM, p. 451).

  6. PM, p. 468.

  7. PM, p. 448.

  8. PM, p. 450.

  9. JP 6:6256.

  10. JP 2:1237.

  11. Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, p. 14 (see further
    p. 14–18).

  12. See note 13 above.

  13. The Essence of Christianity, p. 16

  14. The Essence of Christianity, p. 17.

  15. I elaborate the possible nature of such theological struggle be-
    tween contrary views of God in my Struggling With God.

  16. Psalm 22:1; Matthew 27:46. I explore the ambivalence of
    this further in ‘My God, My God, Why Have You Forsaken Me?
    Between Consolation & Desolation’, in Christopher C.H. Cook
    (ed.), Spirituality, Theology & Mental Health: Multidisciplinary
    Perspectives (London: SCM Press, 2013), pp. 193–210.

Free download pdf