5.2 The Generalized Cusick Identities 185From (5.2.4),∂ai, 2 n∂φ 2 n− 1=ψi.Also,
∂Hn∂φ 2 n− 1=Hn− 1.Hence,
2 n− 1
∑i=1(−1)
i+1
Pf(n)
i
ψi=Hn− 1 Kn. (5.2.24)Similarly,
2 n− 1
∑i=1(−1)
i+1
Pf(n)
i φi=HnKn−^1. (5.2.25)The following three theorems express modified forms of|aij|nin terms of
the Hankelians.
LetBn(φ) denote the determinant which is obtained from|aij|nbyreplacing the last row by the row
[
φ 1 φ 2 φ 3 ...φn]
.
Theorem 5.6.
a.B 2 n− 1 (φ)=Hn− 1 HnK2
n− 1 ,b.B 2 n− 1 (ψ)=H
2
n− 1 Kn−^1 Kn,
c. B 2 n(φ)=−H
2
n
Kn− 1 Kn,d.B 2 n(ψ)=−Hn− 1 HnK
2
n
.
Proof. ExpandingB 2 n− 1 (φ) by elements from the last row and their
cofactors and referring to (5.2.13), (5.2.14), and (5.2.25),
B 2 n− 1 (φ)=2 n− 1
∑j=1φjA(2n−1)
2 n− 1 ,j=Pf(n)
2 n− 12 n− 1
∑i=1(−1)
i+1
Pf(n)
i φi=Pfn− 1 HnKn− 1. (5.2.26)Part (a) now follows from Theorem 5.1 and (b) is proved in a similar
manner.
ExpandingB 2 n(φ) with the aid of Theorem 3.9 on bordered determinants(Section 3.7) and referring to (5.2.11) and (5.2.25),
B 2 n(φ)=−2 n− 1
∑i=12 n− 1
∑j=1ai, 2 nφjA(2n−1)
ij