6.4 The Kay–Moses Equation 249=− 4 c(c−1)α2
1. (6.3.20)
Referring to (6.3.16),
(
y+4n21+x)′
=4
[
(c−1)xA11
+n21+x]′
=− 4 cλ2. (6.3.21)
Differentiating (6.3.19) and using (6.3.17),
y′′
=8c(c−1)λα 1 β 1. (6.3.22)The theorem follows from (6.3.19) and (6.3.22).
6.4 The Kay–Moses Equation...................
Theorem.The Kay–Moses equation, namely
[
D2
+ε2
+2D2
(logA)]
y= 0 (6.4.1)is satisfied by the equation
y=e−ωεx
1 −
n
∑i,j=1e(ci+cj)ωεx
Aijcj− 1
,ω^2 =− 1 ,where
A=|ars|n,ars=δrsbr+e(cr+cs)ωεxcr+cs.
Thebr,r≥ 1 , are arbitrary constants and thecr,r≥ 1 , are constants such
thatcj=1, 1 ≤j≤nandcr+cs=0, 1 ≤r, s≤n, but are otherwise
arbitrary.
The analysis which follows differs from the original both in the form ofthe solution and the method by which it is obtained.
Proof. LetA=|ars(u)|ndenote the symmetric determinant in which
ars=δrsbr+e
(cr+cs)ucr+cs=asr,a′
rs=e(cr+cs)u. (6.4.2)
Then the double-sum relations (A)–(D) in Section 3.4 withfr=gr=cr
become
(logA)′
=∑
r,se(cr+cs)u
Ars
, (6.4.3)