6.7 The Korteweg–de Vries Equation 267
=0+
1
2
∑
p,r
(b
i+2
p
b
j
r
−b
j+2
p
b
i
r
)A
pr
=
1
2
(φi+2,j−φi,j+2),
which is identical with the right side of (a). This completes the proof of
(a).
Referring to (6.7.8) withr, s→p, qandi, j→r, s,
Dx(φij)=
∑
r
∑
s
b
i
rb
j
sDx(A
rs
)
=
∑
r
∑
s
b
i
r
b
j
s
[
1
2
(br+bs)A
rs
−
∑
p
∑
q
A
rq
A
ps
]
=
1
2
∑
r
∑
s
b
i
r
b
j
s
(br+bs)A
rs
−
∑
q,r
b
i
r
A
rq
∑
p,s
b
j
s
A
ps
=
1
2
(φi+1,j+φi,j+1)−φi 0 φj 0 ,
which proves (b). Part (c) is proved in a similar manner.
Particular cases of (a)–(c) are
φ 00 φ 11 −φ
2
10
=
1
2
(φ 21 −φ 03 ), (6.7.18)
Dx(φ 00 )=φ 10 −φ
2
00
,
Dt(φ 00 )=2φ 00 φ 20 −φ
2
10
−φ 30. (6.7.19)
The preparations for finding the derivatives ofvare now complete. The
formula forvgiven by (6.7.7) can be written
v=φ 00 −constant.
Differentiating with the aid of parts (b) and (c) of the lemma,
vx=φ 10 −φ
2
00 ,
vxx=
1
2
(φ 20 +φ 11 − 6 φ 00 φ 10 +4φ
3
00
),
vxxx=
1
4
(φ 30 +3φ 21 − 8 φ 00 φ 20 − 14 φ
2
10
,
+48φ
2
00 φ^10 −^6 φ^00 φ^11 −^24 φ
4
00 )
vt=2φ 00 φ 20 −φ
2
10 −φ^30. (6.7.20)
Hence, referring to (6.7.18),
4(vt+6v
2
x+vxxx)=3
[
(φ 21 −φ 30 )−2(φ 00 φ 11 −φ
2
10 )
]
=0,
which completes the verification of the first form of solution of the KdV
equation by means of recurrence relations.