671017.pdf

key futures of this theory are that neither yield surface nor plastic potential surface needs to be defined explicitly, and cons ...

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 1 (%) 1 − (kPa) 3 0 5 10 15 3 =300kPa 3 =700kPa 3 = 1200kPa (a) 0 1 2 3 4 (%) 3 =300kPa 3 =700kP ...

Burma Laos China Thailand Vietnam (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 2: Nuozhadu dam. (a) Nuozhadu dam location, (b) project blueprint, (c) ...

Upstream Downstream RU 1 RU 3 F2 F 1 RU2 RD 1 RD2 Cofferdam ED F2 F 1 RD 3 RU 1 /RD 1 : upstream/downstream rockfill zone I RU2/ ...

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 300 kPa 900 kPa 1500 kPa^2500 kPa Modied PZ 0 5 10 15 − 1 ( 3 kPa) 1 (%) (a) − 4 − 3 − 2 − 1 0 1 2 3 ...

0 2000 4000 6000 Duncan-Chang EB 0 5 10 15 1 (%) − 1 ( 3 kPa) 3 =300kPa^3 =900kPa 3 = 1500kPa 3 = 2500kPa (a) 0 1 2 (^3) 0 5 10 ...

1 0. 50 .7 (^0). 3 0 .9 0. 1 (a) 0 0.^5 0 −^1 −1. 5 −2. 4 −0.^5 − 2 (b) 0.^5 1 1.^5 2 2.^5 3 3.^5 3 (^2). 5 2 (^11). 5 (^0). 5 ( ...

550 600 650 700 750 800 850 Elevation (m) Settlement (mm) In-situ EB Modified PZ − 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Figure 13: Compari ...

modeltosimulatethestress-strainrelationshipofrockfill materials. Triaxial test results of the filling materials of Nuozhadu dam ...

Journal of Engineering Mechanics,vol.129,no.8,pp.851–860, 2003. [28] H. I. Ling and S. Yang, “Unified sand model based on the cr ...

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics Volume 2013, Article ID 136132, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155 ...

Retaining structure Figure 1: Application of retaining walls in civil engineering. KW KW K KW h hW p a p a Pp Pa p a p a Passive ...

KW W h H F B A cL KhW Pp cL Z 0 (a) h H F A B cL KW W KhW Pa cL Z 0 (b) Figure 3: Proposed model for passive (a) and active (b) ...

Table 1: Parameters of the proposed method. Parameter Symbol Wa l l h e i g h t H Wa t e r d e p t h h Wa l l a n g l e 훼 Soil-w ...

− 90 − + F cL cL + − + − W ( 1 −K)^2 +K^2 h Pp (a) + 90 −− F cL cL W ( 1 −K)^2 +K^2 h − + Pa + + (b) Figure 7: Effective force d ...

0. 47 0. 48 0. 49 0. 5 0. 51 0. 52 00. 40. 81 .2 1. 6 2 B/H Ka =5 Mononobe-Okabe This study (a) 6 8 3 3 .2 00. 40. 81 .2 1. 6 ...

0. 45 0. 53 0. 61 0. 69 0 .77 0. 85 00. 40. 81 .2 1. 6 2 B/H This study Note: no results for M-O method are available K a =20 (g ...

5 3 5 4 5 0 0.20.40.60. 8 1 Level of water/height of wall Kp (a) 45 0. 5 55 0. 6 65 0. 7 0 0.20.40.60. 8 1 Level of wate ...

1 2 3 4 5 012345 Cohesion (ton/m^2 ) Z=0 Z0 Kh=0 Kp (a) 0 1 2 3 4 012345 Cohesion (ton/m^2 ) Z=0 Z0 Kh=0 Ka (b) 5 5 5 5 5 01 ...

some cases, is incapable of offering an answer. Because of its simple assumptions, M-O sometimes stands in an unsafe side of des ...