The Economist April 9th 2022 49
China
Covid-19
Shanghai swoons
T
he effortto stamp out covid19 in
Shanghai has taken on the characteris
tics of a military campaign. The army has
published photos of planes offloading per
sonnel and supplies. Tens of thousands of
medical workers have marched into the ci
ty. At least as many covid patients will be
spirited out—bused to field hospitals in
neighbouring areas, sometimes hundreds
of kilometres away. The rest of the city’s
25m residents will remain locked down as
the fight against the virus drags on.
For two years China’s business and fi
nance hub remained relatively unscathed
by covid. Shanghai was evidence of the
government’s skilful handling of the pan
demic. The country’s “zerocovid” ap
proach, involving mass testing and strict
lockdowns to crush outbreaks, led to fewer
deaths and stronger economic growth than
in other big countries. Xi Jinping, the pres
ident, has hailed the strategy as a great suc
cess—and proof that China’s socialist sys
tem is superior to Western democracy.
But the situation in Shanghai is testing
all that. Not since the start of the pandem
ic, when the government sealed off Wu
han, a city of 11m people, have the country’s
covid measures come under such scrutiny.
The campaign in Shanghai has been noth
ing short of a mess, say residents. They
have faced varying restrictions since early
March and are now confined to their
homes. Food shortages are a problem. Peo
ple complain of going without medicine.
In China’s largest city the government’s
strict covid controls are stoking anger.
For weeks the authorities in Shanghai
experimented with a looser approach.
They used targeted lockdowns on housing
compounds to contain the virus. But the
highly transmissible Omicron variant con
tinued to spread. The government tried to
quash any talk of harsher measures in the
offing, even detaining people for spread
ing rumours. “We’re not going to use the
lockdown strategy for now,” said Zhang
Wenhong, who runs Shanghai’s covid re
sponse, on March 25th. Three days later a
twophase lockdown was announced. First
the east side of the city was closed for four
days, then the west side. Even that proved
ineffective. So, as the staggered lockdown
came to an end, the government closed the
entire city indefinitely.
Unsurprisingly, the authorities were
unready to support people during the hast
ily conceived lockdowns. And residents
themselves were given little time to pre
pare. Some rushed to supermarkets, leav
ing aisles empty. Getting basic provisions
has become a struggle. Messaging boards
linked to Weibo, a popular Twitterlike
platform, have been inundated with pleas
for help. One woman said her father, who is
suffering from cancer, was blocked from
leaving his home and is “considering sui
cide”. A man sought epilepsy medication
for his young son; he “did not dare consid
er the consequences” of failing to obtain it.
Videos show people fighting over boxes of
food. This correspondent has struggled to
obtain potable water.
Abandoned warehouses, expo centres
and shipping containers have been con
verted into makeshift isolation centres for
those who test positive. Videos show pa
tients protesting against a lack of food, wa
ter and treatment. Health workers have
been filmed striking people or pulling
them by their hair from their homes. But
the authorities’ most controversial policy
has been separating covidpositive chil
S HANGHAI
A clumsy lockdown of China’s financial hub is testing the “zero-covid” strategy
→Alsointhissection
50 HongKong’snextleader
51 Is Chinahoardinggrain?
52 Chaguan: Soviet-history lessons