The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega A Linguistic Perspective

(Dana P.) #1
245


  1. Pauen S. The global-to-basic level shift in infants’ categorical thinking: fi rst evidence from a
    longitudinal study. Int J Behav Dev. 2002;26:492–9.

  2. Stevens P. How to interpret botanical classifi cations - suggestions from history. Bioscience.
    1997;47(4):243–50.

  3. Hunn E. A Zapotec natural history. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press; 2008.

  4. Si A. Aspects of honeybee natural history according to the Solega. Ethnobiol Lett.
    2013;4:78–86.

  5. Hunn E, French D. Alternatives to taxonomic hierarchy: the Sahaptin case. J Ethnobiol.
    1984;4(1):73–92.

  6. Hays T. Ndumba folk biology and general principles of ethnobotanical classifi cation and
    nomenclature. Am Anthropol. 1983;85(3):592–611.

  7. Bulmer R. Folk biology in the New Guinea Highlands. Social Sci Inf. 1974;13(4/5):9–28.

  8. Bentley J, Rodriguez G. Honduran folk entomology. Curr Anthropol. 2001;42(2):285–300.

  9. Hays T. Utilitarian/adaptationist explanations of folk biological classifi cation: some caution-
    ary notes. J Ethnobiol. 1982;2(1):89–94.

  10. Harper D. A bioeconomic study of numeracy and economic calculation. J Bioecon.
    2008;10:101–26.

  11. Hurford J. Language and number: the emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Basil
    Blackwell; 1987.

  12. Lean G. Counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania. Lae: Papua New Guinea
    University of Technology; 1992.

  13. Hammarstrom H. Number bases, frequencies and lengths cross-linguistically. Linguistic
    Perspectives on Numerical Expressions; 2004 June 10–11; Utrecht, Netherlands.

  14. Ridley M. (Re)reading The Origin. Curr Biol. 2009;19(3):R2–3.

  15. Hooke D. Trees in the Anglo-Saxon landscape: the Charter evidence. In: Biggam CP, editor.
    From earth to art: the many aspects of the plant-world in Anglo-Saxon England. Amsterdam:
    Rodopi; 2003. p. 17–40.

  16. Gelling M. Place-names in the landscape. London: J. M. Dent; 1984.

  17. Astour M. Ancient North Syrian toponyms derived from plant names. In: Rendsburg G, Adler
    R, Arfa M, Winter N, editors. The Bible world: essays in honor of Cyrus H. Gordon.
    New York: KTAV Publishing House; 1980. p. 1–8.

  18. Kislev M. Reference to the pistachio tree in Near East geographical names. Palest Explor Q.
    1985;117(2):133–8.

  19. Gyorffy E, editor. Old Hungarian river names in the multilingual Carpathian Basin. 23rd
    International Congress of Onomastic Sciences; 2008; Toronto: Youk University.

  20. Baker B. ‘I’m going to where-her-brisket-is’: placenames in the Roper. In: Hercus L, Hodges
    F, Simpson J, editors. The land is a map: placenames of indigenous origin in Australia.
    Canberra: Pandanus Books and Pacifi c Linguistics; 2002. p. 103–29.

  21. Ryan B. Some aboriginal place names on the mid-north coast of New South Wales. Oceania.
    1964;34(4):278–307.

  22. Si A, Agnihotri S. Solega placenames and their ecological signifi cance. Anthropol Ling.
    2014;56(3–4):389–414.

  23. Agnihotri S, Si A. Solega ethno-ornithology. J Ethnobiol. 2012;32(2):185–211.

  24. Grimmett R, Inskipp T. Birds of Southern India. London: A & C Black Publishers; 2005.

  25. Diamond J, Bishop D. Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban People, Indonesian New Guinea.
    In: Medin D, Atran S, editors. Folk biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999. p. 17–46.

  26. Ng’weno F. Sound, sight, stories and science: avoiding pitfalls in ethno-ornithological
    research, with examples from Kenya. In: Tidemann S, Gosler A, editors. Ethno-ornithology:
    birds, indigenous peoples, culture and society. London: Earthscan; 2010. p. 103–14.

  27. Grace G. The linguistic construction of reality. London: Routledge; 1987.

  28. Wierzbicka A. Empirical universals of language as a basis for the study of other human uni-
    versals and as a tool for exploring cross-cultural differences. Ethos. 2005;33(2):256–91.

  29. Bulmer R. Mystical and mundane in Kalam classifi cation of birds. In: Ellen R, Reason D,
    editors. Classifi cations in their social context. London: Academic Press; 1979. p. 57–79.


References

Free download pdf