The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega A Linguistic Perspective

(Dana P.) #1
247


  1. Pawley A. Lexicalization. In: Tannen D, Alatis J, editors. Languages and linguistics: the
    interdependence of theory, data, and application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University
    Press; 1986.

  2. Kull K. Ecosystems are made of semiosic bonds: consortia, umwelten, biophony and ecologi-
    cal codes. Biosemiotics. 2010;3(3):347–57.

  3. Cobley P. The cultural implications of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics. 2010;3(2):225–44.

  4. Kull K. Semiosphere and a dual ecology: paradoxes of communication. Sign Syst Stud.
    2005;33(1):175–89.

  5. Sebeok T. The sign science and the life science. Appl Semiot. 1999;3(6/7):85–96.

  6. Eulau H. Perceptions of class and party in voting behavior: 1952. Am Polit Sci Rev.
    1955;49(2):364–84.

  7. Lo A, Reyes A. Language, identity and relationality in Asian Pacifi c America: an introduc-
    tion. Pragmatics. 2004;14(2/3):115–25.

  8. Clayton N, Dally J, Emery N. Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-
    jay as a natural psychologist. Philos Trans R Soc. 2007;362(1480):507–22.

  9. Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Smuts B. Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman pri-
    mates. Science. 1986;234(4782):1361–6.

  10. Rist L, Shanker RU, Milner-Gulland E, Ghaznoul J. The use of traditional ecological knowl-
    edge in forest management: an example from India. Ecol Soc. 2010;15(1):3.

  11. Tanaka J, Curran T. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol Sci.
    2001;12(1):43–7.

  12. McShea D. Metazoan complexity and evolution: is there a trend? Evolution.
    1996;50(2):477–92.

  13. Gould S. Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Three Rivers
    Press; 1996.

  14. McConvell P. The origin of subsections in Northern Australia. Oceania. 1985;56:1–33.

  15. Fortunato L, Jordan F. Your place or mine? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of postmari-
    tal residence in Indo-European and Austronesian societies. Philos Trans R Soc B.
    2010;365(1559):3913–22.

  16. Gray R, Drummond A, Greenhill S. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and
    pauses in Pacifi c settlement. Science. 2009;323(5913):479–83.

  17. Dunnell R. The concept of progress in cultural evolution. In: Nitecki M, editor. Evolutionary
    progress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1988. p. 169–94.

  18. Demmer U. Voices in the forest: the fi eld of gathering among the Jenu Kurumba. In: Hockings
    P, editor. Blue mountains revisited: cultural studies on the Nilgiri Hills. Delhi: Oxford
    University Press; 1997. p. 165–91.

  19. Kapp DB. Honigsammeln und Jagen bei den Alu Kurumbas. Anthropos St Augustin.
    1983;78:715–38.

  20. Campbell M. Busy bees: utopia, dystopia, and the very small. J Mediev Early Mod Stud.
    2006;36(3):619–42.

  21. Prete F. Can females rule the hive? The controversy over honey bee gender roles in British
    beekeeping texts of the sixteenth--eighteenth centuries. J Hist Biol. 1991;24(1):113–44.

  22. Aristotle. Generation of animals, Book III. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1953.

  23. Aristotle. History of animals: In ten books. Tr. by Richard Cresswell. London: Bell; 1883.

  24. Gedde J. The English apiary; or Compleat Bee Master. London: E. Curll, W. Mears, and
    T. Corbet; 1721.

  25. Dyer F. Nocturnal orientation by the Asian honey bee Apis dorsata. Anim Behav.
    1985;33:769–74.

  26. Thanos C. Aristotle and Theophrastus on plant-animal interactions. In: Arianoutsou M,
    Groves RH, editors. Plant-animal interactions in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Amsterdam:
    Kluwer Academic; 1994. p. 3–11.

  27. Negbi M. Male and female in Theophrastus’s botanical works. J Hist Biol.
    1995;28(2):317–32.


References

Free download pdf