Evolution, 4th Edition

LC–10 LITERATURE CITED

speciation in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 13875–

13879.

108. Yukilevich, R. 2012. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely
     support reinforcement in Drosophila. Evolution 66: 1430–1446.

CHAPTER 10

1. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in
   a widowbird. Nature 299: 818–820.


2. Andrade, M. C. B. 1996. Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the
   Australian redback spider. Science 271: 70–72.


3. Arnold, S. J., and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: A
   synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143: 317–348.


4. Bachtrog, D., and 14 others. 2014. Sex determination: Why so many
   ways of doing it? PLoS Biol. 12.


5. Barber, I., S. A. Arnott, V. A. Braithwaite, J. Andrew, and F. A.
   Huntingford. 2001. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice
   in sticklebacks: Offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist
   parasitic infections. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 71–76.


6. Basolo, A. L. 1995. Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a preexisting
   bias in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259: 307–311.


7. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:
   349–368.


8. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224:
   223–265.


9. Berglund, A., A. Bisazza, and A. Pilastro. 1996. Armaments and
   ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol.
   J. Linn. Soc. 58: 385–399.


10. Castellano, D., M. Coronado-Zamora, J. L. Campos, A. Barbadilla,
    and A. Eyre-Walker. 2016. Adaptive evolution is substantially
    impeded by Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol.
    33: 442–455.


11. Charlesworth, D., X. Vekemans, V. Castric, and S. Glemin. 2005. Plant
    self-incompatibility systems: A molecular evolutionary perspective.
    New Phytol. 168: 61–69.


12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1982. Red deer: Behavior and ecology of two sexes.
    University of Chicago Press, Chicago.


13. Cortez, D., and 7 others. 2014. Origins and functional evolution of Y
    chromosomes across mammals. Nature 508: 488–493.


14. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1965. Evolution in sexual and asexual
    populations. Am. Nat. 99: 439–450.


15. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard
    University Press, Cambridge, MA.


16. Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and
    evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.


17. Felsenstein, J. 1974. Evolutionary advantage of recombination.
    Genetics 78: 737–756.


18. Fontaneto, D., and 6 others. 2007. Independently evolving species in
    asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biol. 5: 914–921.


19. Gwynne, D. T. 2008. Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects.
    Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 83–101.


20. Hamilton, W. D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477–488.


21. Harcourt, A. H., P. H. Harvey, S. G. Larson, and R. V. Short. 1981.
    Testis weight, body weight and breeding systems in primates. Nature
    293: 55–57.


22. Herre, E. A. 1985. Sex-ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science 228:
    896–898.


23. Janzen, F. J., and G. L. Paukstis. 1991. Environmental sex
    determination in reptiles: Ecology, evolution, and experimental
    design. Q. Rev. Biol. 66: 149–179.


24. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and
    mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev.
    Camb. Philos. Soc. 72: 283–327.


25. Kamran-Disfani, A., and A. F. Agrawal. 2014. Selfing, adaptation
    and background selection in finite populations. J. Evol. Biol. 27:
    1360–1371.


26. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. The strength of indirect
    selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:
    1282–1286.


27. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating
    preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33–38.


28. Komdeur, J., S. Daan, J. Tinbergen, et al. 1997. Extreme adaptive
    modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler’s eggs. Nature 385:
    522–525.


29. Lively, C. M., and J. Jokela. 2002. Temporal and spatial distributions
    of parasites and sex in a freshwater snail. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 219–226.


30. McDonald, M. J., D. P. Rice, and M. M. Desai. 2016. Sex speeds
    adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution. Nature
    531: 233–236.


31. McLean, C. Y., and 12 others. 2011. Human-specific loss of regulatory
    DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits. Nature 471: 216–


32. 
    


33. National Library of Medicine Genetics Home Reference. 2015. Y
    chromosome. ghr.nlm.nih.gov


34. Oliveira, R. F., M. Taborsky, and H. J. Brockmann. 2008. Alternative
    Reproductive Tactics. Cambridge University Press, New York.


35. Otto, S. P. 2009. The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am. Nat. 174: S1–
    S14.


36. Packer, C., and A. E. Pusey. 1983. Adaptations of female lions to
    infanticide by incoming males. Am. Nat. 121: 716–728.


37. Page, R. A., M. J. Ryan, and X. E. Bernal. 2013. Be loved, be prey,
    be eaten. In K. Yasukawa, ed. Animal Behavior. Vol. 3: Case Studies:
    Integration and Application of Animal Behavior, pp. 123–154. Praeger,
    New York.


38. Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary
    consequences in insects. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45: 525–567.


39. Peck, J. R. 1994. A ruby in the rubbish—beneficial mutations,
    deleterious mutations, and the evolution of sex. Genetics 137: 597–


40. 
    


41. Pietsch, T. W. 2005. Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited:
    modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes
    (Teleostei: Lophiiformes). Ichthyol. Res. 52: 207–236.


42. Prokop, Z. M., Ł. Michalczyk, S. M. Drobniak, M. Herdegen, and J.
    Radwan. 2012. Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons
    more than “good genes.” Evolution 66: 2665–2673.


43. Redfield, R. J. 2001. Do bacteria have sex? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 634–639.


44. Richards, C. M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a
    plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155: 383–394.


45. Rodd, F. H., K. A. Hughes, G. F. Grether, and C. T. Baril. 2001. A
    possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: ERE male guppies
    mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 475–481.


46. Ryan, M. J., and M. E. Cummings. 2013. Perceptual biases and mate
    choice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44: 437–459.


47. Shuster, S. M. 2007. The evolution of crustacean mating systems.
    In E. J. Duffy and M. Thiel (eds.), Evolutionary Ecology of Social and
    Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms (pp. 29–47). Oxford
    University Press, New York.


48. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 1991. Equal mating success among
    male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350: 608–


49. 
    


50. Stern, C. 1973. Principles of Human Genetics. W. H. Freeman, San
    Francisco.


51. Vergara, D., J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively. 2014. Infection dynamics in
    coexisting sexual and asexual host populations: Support for the Red
    Queen hypothesis. Am. Nat. 184: S22–S30.


52. Walsh, N. E., and D. Charlesworth. 1992. Evolutionary interpretations
    of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q. Rev. Biol. 67: 19–37.

25_EVOL4E_LIT_CITED.indd 10 3/22/17 1:58 PM