Notes 195
- Bryan S. Turner, “Classical Sociology and Cosmopolitanism: A
Critical Defence of the Social,” The British Journal of Sociology , 57
(2006), 133–151 (p. 143).
3 2. I b i d.
- Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level: Why Equality
Is Better for Everyone (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2009), Mobibook
edition, p. 429.
3 4. I b i d.
- Gavin Kendall, Ian Woodward, and Zlatko Skrbis, The Sociology of
Cosmopolitanism (Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
2009), p. 157.
3 6. I b i d. , p. 1 5 6.
- Ackbar Abbas, “Cosmopolitan De-scriptions: Shanghai and Hong
Kong,” in Cosmopolitanism , ed. Carol A. Breckenridge et al. (Durham:
Duke University Press, 2002), p. 211.
3 8. S t e f a n J o n s s o n , “ T h e I d e o l o g y o f U n i v e r s a l i s m , ” New Left Review , 63
(2010), 115–126 (p. 117).
3 9. P e t e r G o w a n , A Calculus of Power (London: Verso, 2010), p. 4.
4 0. P a u l G i l r o y , Postcolonial Melancholia (New York: Columbia Universit y
Press, 2005), p. 126.
4 1. R e i n h a r d t G r o s s m a n n , The Existence of the World: An Introduction to
Ontology (London: Routledge, 1992), p. 1.
4 2. F r e d W i l s o n , Knowledge: Collected Essays in Ontology (Heusenstamm:
Ontos Verlag, 2007), p. 2.
4 3. K a r l M a r x , Capital, Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy , trans.
Ben Fowkes (London: Penguin, 1999), p. 173.
4 4. B e n i t a P a r r y , Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique (London and
New York: Routledge, 2004), p. 11.
4 5. P i e r r e M a c h e r e y , In a Materialist Way , trans. Ted Stolze (London:
Verso, 1998), p. 102.
4 6. P i e r r e M a c h e r e y , A Theory of Literary Production , trans. Geoggrey Wall
(New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 88.
1 A COSMOPOLITAN VISION OF HOME AND
SUBJECTIVITY IN CARYL PHILLIPS
1. See Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison ,
trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage Books, 1995).
2. Michel Foucault, “The Subject and Power,” trans. Leslie Sawyer,
Critical Inquiry , 8 (1982), 777–795 (pp. 780–781).
