HSFC_2017_01_11

(Jacob Rumans) #1

XXXXX SFChronicle.com |Wednesday,January 11, 2017|C3


BUSINESS


injectwater. Those in-
jectionswould also help
squeeze more petroleum
from the Livermore Oil
Field, which has been in
production for more than
50 years.
E&B, based in Bakers-
field, sees the proposal as
essentially extending a
practice thatit already
performs on the site, a
company spokeswoman
said.
Environmentalists,
howeve r, consider the
step a potential threat to
groundwater. Lastyear,
they successfully pushed
for a ban onhydraulic
fracturing in Alameda


County,even though the
Livermore OilField is
the onlyactive field in
the county anddoes not
use fracking.
“There’s this overall
concern thatwe are sac-
rificing usable ground-
water to theoil industry
to let them expandoil
and gas operationswhen
we should be heading in
the other direction,” said
Hollin Kretzmann,staff
attorney with the Center
for Biological Diversity.
His group plans a
demonstration before the
5 p.m.start of thestate
hearing,which will be
held in the Livermore
City Councilchambers.
The division will not

make adecision on the
proposalat the hearing,
instead usingit to collect
public comments.The
proposal needs theap-
proval of both the divi-
sion and the federal En-
vironmental Protection
Agency to take effect.
All Californiaoil fields
contain large amounts of
brinywater mixed with
the petroleum. Once
brought to thesurface,
the water is separated
from theoil and can
sometimes be treated for
use in irrigation.More
often,oil companies put
it back underground,
often usingit to maintain
pressure within theiroil
fields.

That practice, howev-
er, has come under in-
creased scrutiny in re-
cent years after revela-
tions that thestate had,
for decades, allowed
companies to inject their
wastewater into un-
derg roundaquifers that

were supposed to be
protectedby federal law.
The Li vermore Oil
Field already has a small
zonewhere the federal
government allows un-
derg round injections.
The current proposal
would expand that zone
to co ver more of the field.
E&B maintains that
water currently sitting in
the underground forma-
tion containsoil and high
levels of boron and could
not realistically be used
for drinking or irriga-
tion. According to the
company’sapplication,
the zonewhere wastewa-
ter injectionswould
occur lies 1,500 feet be-
low thedeepest nearby

wells used for drinking
water, making contam-
ination unlikely.
Kretzmann argues that
contaminants could mi-
grate from one under-
ground zone to another
along thewells them-
selves. The water, he
said, could also move
along the Greenville
Fault —which runs
along theoil field’s east-
ern border —should the
fault rupture in an earth-
quake. A 5.8 magnitude
quake occurred on the
fault in1980.

David R.Baker is a San
Francisco Chronicle staff
writer. Email: dbaker@
sfchronicle.com

Driller seeks permit to injectoil well wastewater


Wells from page C1 “There’s this


overall concern
that we are
sacrificing usable
groundwater to
the oil industry.”
Hollin Kretzmann, staff
attorney withthe Center for
BiologicalDivers ity

Television networks
make moneyby charging
advertisers rates based
on viewership.It certain-
ly helpswhen you are
the onlychannelshow-
casing anevent.
During the firstRe-
publicandebate in Cleve-
land inAugust,Fox
News attracted awhop-
ping 24 million viewers
— in 2012, the largest
audience forsucha de-
bate was 7.1 million.
Knowing this,Trump
consistently bragged
about how he made net-
works a lot of moneyby
boosting ratings.He was
not wrong.
Of course, people
could followquip s and
commentaryabout the
debate onTwitter, and
plenty did.But impor-
tant events like presi-
dential debates are best
played out on television,
not 140charactersat a
time.
Which brings us to to
anotherflaw in Twitter.
The reasonsTrump likes
to useit — its brevity and
forum for unfettered
speech — are thevery
reasons thatthe compa-
ny can’t exploit his pop-
ularity.
“WhetherTrump says
somethinggood or bad,
reasonable or outra-
geous, andwhether us-
ers likeTrump or not,
they may find a reason to
engage with him through
replies or retweets as


long as he isactively
using the platform, all of
which means more en-
gagement,” said Pinar
Yildirim, an assistant
professor of marketing
with theUniversity of
Pennsylvania’sWharton
School.
But Trumpdoes not
really engage with his
audience.His modus
operandi is to tweet
something and then let
everyone else talkabout
it.
Trump also has a gift
— if you can callit that —

for bringing out the
worst in people.Whether
we’re speakingabout his
critics,who bashevery-
thing he says or does, or
his supporters,who bash
everything his critics say
or do.
The downside, Yildi-
rim said, iswhen Trump
supporters or opponents
become sodominant that
those with opposing
views feel alienated and
they become less en-
gaged.
Critics have already
chastisedTwitter for not

doing enough to battle
hate speech and protect
people from online
abuse. Throw in some of
Trump’s morevocal and
vicious followers, and
you create an environ-
mentwhere racism,
misogyny and plain
cruelty can thrive.
That’s not the kind of
business most companies
like to bragabout, espe-
ciallywhen theywant to
woo advertisers.Twitter
seems to have recognized
this, makingdeals with
the likes of theNational

FootballLeague to
broadcast football games
and other, moreadvertis-
er-friendlyfare, on mo-
bile apps andInternet-
connected TVs.But those
deals can’t ch ange the
short, text-focused na-
ture ofTwitter’s core
service.It doesn’t seem
likely thatTrumpwould
arrange tostreamWhite
House press briefings on
Twitter, as fond as he is
of tweeting.
Twitter is not alone in
facing this problem.
Plenty of people use the

online discussion service
Reddit tochat ab out
news. But Reddit can’t
find away to make mon-
ey, becauseit, too,suffers
from severe trolling.
There are certainly
trolls onFacebook.But
users can better control
their experience. And the
social network is better
known as a placewhere
friends andfamily swap
news, videos and photos
than onewhere you
exchange taunts and
insults with complete
strangers.
“It doesn’t take age-
nius to connect thedots
of a rise inabuse on
Twitter — bothits quan-
tity and savagery,” Umair
Haque, director ofHavas
Media Labs, recently
wrote in theHarvard
BusinessReview. “Twit-
ter’s central problem is
low-quality interaction.
Today, we live in a world
of strikingly dismally
low-quality interactions.
Can you remember the
last timeyou really en-
joyed going to a big-box
store, bank, hospital?”
Trump may enjoy
broadcasting his views
on Twitter. He doesn’t
care whetherit makes
anyone elsewant to use
the service.There’s Twit-
ter’s problem — in less
than 140characters.

Thomas Lee is a San
Francisco Chronicle
columnist. Email:tlee@
sfchronicle.com Twitter:
@ByTomLee

Trump tweets don’t translate to profit


Leefrom page C1


Josh Haner / NewYorkTimes 2015
DonaldTrump likesto be provocati ve in 140 characters.He tweets and lets others talkabout what he sa ys.

Facebook founder
Mark Zuckerberg and his
wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan,
have vowed to put their
enormouswealth toward
philanthropic causes.
Now the couple are put-
ting infrastructure in
place to makesure their
money and efforts will
make an impact on policy
as well.
Zuckerberg and Chan
have hired a top political
operative to lead the next
phase of their philan-
thropicwork at the Chan
ZuckerbergInitiati ve, the
limited liability company
they setup in 2015 to
conductcharitable ef-
forts. DavidPlouffe,who
managed Barack Obama’s
2008 presidential cam-
paign and ischief adviser
and a board memberat
Uber, is leaving the ride-
hailing company to join
the ChanZuckerberg
Initiati ve as president of
policy andadvocacy.
In ad dition,Zucker-
berg and Chan are form-
ing a public policy board
of formergovernment
officials and other experts
in the fields of education
and science.The new
board will be ledby Ken-
neth Mehlman,who man-
aged President George W.
Bush ’s 2004 re-election


campaign and is now
head ofglob al public
affairsat Kohlberg Kravis
Roberts, the private equi-
ty firm.Mehlman will
volunteer part of his time
to the new board,which is
recruiting other members
who will also serve part
time.
The additions under-
line howZuckerberg and
Chan are pushing to give
their philanthropicwork
—which has focused on
education, science and
curing disease — a greater
voice inWashington and
among movements and
advocacy groupsacross
the country. The couple’s
clout stems primarily
from theirsubstantial
fortune;when they an-
nounced theywould give
99 percent of theirFace-
bookshares tocharitable
causes, their holdings
were worth more than $45
billionat the time.
“You can makechange,
but in order forit to be
sust ainable,you need to
build a movement to
supportit,” Zuckerberg
said in an interview. “No
amount of private re-
search or philanthropy is
going toshift that.At the
end of the day, the govern-
ment hasfar more re-
sources than any individ-
ual organizationdoes.”
Zuckerberg and Chan,

who li ve only a few miles
from the ChanZucker-
berg Initiati ve’s office in
Palo Alto, are regularly
involved in its direction
and majordecisions.The
couple have identified
several main causes,
including curing all dis-
ease, towhich they have
pledged $3 billion, and
changing theway chil-
dren are educated
through personalized
learning, underwhich
teaching is more tailored
to ea ch ch ild.
In his new role,Plouffe

will run the ChanZucker-
berg Initiati ve’s team of a
few dozen people on a
day-to-day basis.Plouffe
described the job in terms
similar to a campaign
effort.
“Curing disease, im-
proving education
through personalized
learning and building
technology and tools to
help organizations reach
their full potential are
areas with widespread
support and massive
potential for mobilization,
greatstorytelling and

smart policy engage-
ment,” he wrote in aFace-
book post.
Travis Kalanick, Uber’s
chief executive, described
Plouffe’s departure as
amicable.Plouffe will
remain onUber’s board
and continueadvising
Kalanick.
Zuckerberg and Chan
unveiled the ChanZuck-
erbergInitiati ve not long
after the 2015 birth of
their daughter, Maxima
ChanZuckerberg, known
as Max. In a letter written
to her thatwas posted on

Facebookat the time,
Zuckerberg and Chan
outlined several reasons
for directing their philan-
thropy toward “a dvanc-
ing human potential and
promoting equality” for
those inMax’s generation.
Almost immediately,
howeve r, Zuckerberg and
Chan came under fire for
the organizationalstruc-
ture of the initiative. Un-
der a limited liability
company, they are bound
by fewer rules when it
comes to directing their
assets than theywould be
in other philanthropic
vehicles.The structure
also provides certain tax
benefits.The couple have
used some of the money
to in vest in startups relat-
ed to their educational
and scientific interests.
Plouffe andMehlman
join Jim Shelton, a former
deputy secretary of the
Department ofEducation
brought on inMay to
oversee efforts in educa-
tion, and Cori Bargmann,
aneuroscientist formerly
of RockefellerUniversity,
tapped in September as
president of science. Bri-
an Pinkerton, a former
Amazon executive, was
namedchief technology
officer in October.

Mike Isaac is aNew York
Times writer.

Chan Zuckerberg Initiati ve ge ts political


By Mike Isaac


Liz Hafalia /The Chronicle 2015
David Plouffe will leave his role as chief adviserat Uberto become president
of policy and advocacy at the ChanZuckerbergInitiati ve.
Free download pdf