The EconomistFebruary 10th 2018 39
1
O
N THE evening of February 6th the
lights went out across most of Cara-
cas, Venezuela’s capital, justas the city’s
rush hour was beginning. Unable to take
the metro, tens of thousands of workers
were forced to walk the crime-ridden
streets. Many took the power cut as a meta-
phor for the country’s snuffed-out democ-
racy and lost prosperity.
At precisely the same time, Jorge Rodrí-
guez, Venezuela’s expensively dressed
communications minister, wasarriving at
a meeting in the Dominican Republic. He
has been the chief negotiator for the coun-
try’s leftist regime in sporadic talks with
the opposition that have taken place over
the past 16 months. Brandishing a bright
yellow pen he declared that a deal had
been reached. Signing it, he said, was a
mere “formality”.
Anyone credulous enough to believe
him was soon disabused. On February
7th the opposition delegation, led by Julio
Borges, the former head of Venezuela’s par-
liament, made a counter-proposal. It re-
peated a long-standing demand that the
president, Nicolás Maduro, restore the
democratic institutions that he has sub-
verted since taking office in 2013. It called
for establishing an independent electoral
council to replace the current one, which
does the bidding of the “Bolivarian” re-
gime. The opposition also sought the rein-
statement of banned political parties, the
freeing of some 200 political prisoners and
He can count on weak opposition. That
is partly because he has dealt with anyone
who might threaten him by putting them
out of action. Some of the opposition’s
most prominent leaders are under house
arrest, barred from office or in exile. In Jan-
uary, the electoral authority banned the
Democratic Unity roundtable, the co-
alition ofopposition parties, from nomi-
nating a candidate. It also declared that the
two biggest opposition partieshad failed
to register correctly, which disqualifies
them from fielding candidates.
Mr Maduro may nonetheless face a ri-
val or two. Henry Ramos Allup, a veteran
politician, and Henri Falcón, a former ally
of Chávez, have talked of running against
the president. Mr Maduro might not mind.
Some show of opposition would give the
election a gloss of legitimacy. It would fur-
ther split the opposition, which has failed
to choose a single leader in 18 years ofcha-
vista rule. If more than one rival takes Mr
Maduro on, all the better. They would split
the anti-government vote, making it easier
for him to win the one-round election.
He has rushed the election in part to
deny the opposition time to prepare (it
need not be held before December). He
may also be calculating that the economy
will be in even worse shape by then.
Underinvestment and corruption have
broughtPDVSA, the state oil firm, which
provides nearly all of Venezuela’s foreign
income, close to collapse. Its production is
at its lowest level in nearly 30 years. Rating
agencies have declared the company to be
in technical default after it repeatedly paid
late interest on its bonds. Both PDVSAand
Venezuela itself are scheduled to make
$9.5bn in principal and interest payments
this year. An outright default would make
it far more difficult to export oil, and thus to
feed Venezuelans even attoday’ssubsis-
tence level.
access to the media.
Mr Rodríguez refused to look at the doc-
ument. So there was no deal. The talks
were suspended indefinitely. Hourslater
the electoral commission announced that
a presidential election will be held on
April 22nd. Together, the breakdown of the
talks and the setting of the date seem to
dash anylingering hope thatthe election
will be anything other than a fraud.
Perhaps, as the government’s most rad-
ical opponents have long argued, the talks
were doomed from the start. The govern-
ment was never going to allow a fair presi-
dential election. This year the economy
will be a third smaller than it was in 2013,
the year Mr Maduro took over from Hugo
Chávez, the regime’s charismatic founder.
The IMFexpects inflation to be 13,000%.
Food is scarce. The president blames this
mess on malevolent outside powers, such
as the United States. Most Venezuelans
rightly blame him and his government. His
approval rating is around 25%.
With foes like these
Mr Maduro now plans to fight the elections
on the basis of the document his negotia-
tors offered in the Dominican Republic.
That will allow for the presence ofUNelec-
toral observers and a modest reform of the
electoral authority. He will then no doubt
proclaim that he has arranged for the elec-
tion, which will give him a fresh six-year
term in office, to be a fair one.
Venezuela
Lights out for democracy
CARACAS
After the collapse of talks with the opposition, Nicolás Maduro plans for victory in
a rigged election
The Americas
Also in this section
40 Ontario’s troublesome wage rise
40 Trump supporters in Mexico
42 Bello: The peril of political decay