But regarding the Former Prophets and the remainder of the Writings, it
can only be claimed that the literature was known to the Qumran
covenanters; it may or may not have been considered Scripture, though the
presence of four copies of Canticles presumably indicates that it was read
at least as spiritual allegory.
Shifts in the Process toward Canon
While the terminology regarding the canonical process may be clarified,
and the evidence from Qumran may witness to certain Scriptures but no
canon yet, the waters remain largely uncharted for the more important
and intriguing issue of the socio-political struggles and theological debates
that formed the path to the eventual canon. A few turns in the path, how-
ever, can be seen.
First, there was a shift from national literature to sacred Scripture, de-
scribed above. Some works of Israel’s literature became recognized as hav-
ing divine origin and thus were regarded as sacred Scripture.
Second, there was a shift in the understanding of revelation. Whereas
revelation had been seen as dynamic and a continuing possibility, gradu-
ally it was viewed as verbal and recorded in the distant past. This gets ex-
pressed in the ancient (and a lingering modern) conviction regarding the
cessation of prophecy.
Third, there was a shift from a religion centered primarily on the Tem-
ple and its rituals to a religion centered on its texts. This was a result of the
destruction of the Temple and the ability of shared texts to function as a
unifying force even for a people spread throughout Diaspora communities.
Fourth, vague consciousness had to give way to clear decisions regard-
ing the scriptural status of books toward the periphery. The new focus on
sacred texts as Judaism’s centripetal force required new questions, scrutiny,
debate, and decisions about the relative status of various texts. While all
Jews recognized the sanctity of the Torah and most recognized divine reve-
lation in a collection of prophetic books, now decisions had to be made
concerning which books belonged in the “Prophets” collection and
whether extra books might also deserve to be accorded supreme authority.
Fifth, a dramatic shift replaced textual pluriformity with uniformity.
Throughout the Second Temple period, the texts were characterized by
fluidity, pluriformity, and creativeness in composition. But the shocks of
the two revolts and the increased importance of the texts precluded fur-
147
The Jewish Scriptures: Texts, Versions, Canons
EERDMANS -- Early Judaism (Collins and Harlow) final text
Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:03:59 PM